Literature DB >> 21421935

A double dissociation of implicit and explicit memory in younger and older adults.

Nigel Gopie1, Fergus I M Craik, Lynn Hasher.   

Abstract

This study examined whether age-related differences in cognition influence later memory for irrelevant, or distracting, information. In Experiments 1 and 2, older adults had greater implicit memory for irrelevant information than younger adults did. When explicit memory was assessed, however, the pattern of results reversed: Younger adults performed better than older adults on an explicit memory test for the previously irrelevant information, and older adults performed less well than they had on the implicit test. Experiment 3 investigated whether this differential pattern was attributable to an age-related decline in encoding resources, by reducing the encoding resources of younger adults with a secondary task; their performance perfectly simulated the pattern shown by the older adults in the first two experiments. Both older and younger adults may remember irrelevant information, but they remember it in different ways because of age-related changes in how information is processed at encoding and utilized at retrieval.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421935     DOI: 10.1177/0956797611403321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

Review 1.  A four-component model of age-related memory change.

Authors:  M Karl Healey; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Normal aging and the dissociable prototype learning systems.

Authors:  Brian D Glass; Tanya Chotibut; Jennifer Pacheco; David M Schnyer; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-29

3.  Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Ruthann C Thomas; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Complementary attentional components of successful memory encoding.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Julie D Golomb; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Philip Schoenfeld; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Emily K Ward; Ajay Bansal; Yeonil Kim; Lindsay Hosford; Aimee Myers; Stephanie Foster; Jenna Craft; Samuel Shopinski; Robert H Wilson; Dennis J Ahnen; Amit Rastogi; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Esther Fujiwara; Bridgette C Gerson; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-27

7.  When Distraction Holds Relevance: A Prospective Memory Benefit for Older Adults.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Divided attention improves delayed, but not immediate retrieval of a consolidated memory.

Authors:  Yoav Kessler; Susan Vandermorris; Nigel Gopie; Alexander Daros; Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The ironic effect of older adults' increased task motivation: Implications for neurocognitive aging.

Authors:  A Dawn Ryan; Karen L Campbell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Preserved memory-based orienting of attention with impaired explicit memory in healthy ageing.

Authors:  Gerardo Salvato; Eva Z Patai; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.