AIMS: To describe the clinicopathological features of florid peritoneal mesothelial hyperplasia associated with gynaecological disease. METHODS: Review of a series of 44 cases where there was significant peritoneal mesothelial proliferation, usually on the surface of the ovary, which resulted in diagnostic problems, often including a consideration of malignancy. RESULTS: Florid mesothelial proliferation was associated with a variety of benign and malignant lesions, most commonly endometriosis. The most characteristic morphological appearance was that of small bland tubules and nests and cords of cells often embedded in fibrous tissue, sometimes with a linear arrangement. In a minority of cases, there were closely packed small glands and papillae resulting in mimicry of a serous proliferation; psammoma bodies were present in one such case. In several cases, the groups of mesothelial cells either exhibited true lymphovascular invasion or were surrounded by spaces closely simulating lymphovascular invasion. Although most cases were appreciated to represent a reactive mesothelial proliferation, several were referred with a presumed or possible diagnosis of mesothelioma, low-grade serous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenomatoid tumour or Sertoli cell tumour. Positive staining with calretinin and negative staining with Ber-EP4 often helped to identify the cells as mesothelial rather than epithelial. CONCLUSIONS: Florid peritoneal mesothelial hyperplasia can occur in association with a variety of gynaecological disorders. Recognition of this phenomenon and appreciation that it can produce worrisome histological patterns, particularly when associated with endometriosis, is key to reaching the correct diagnosis.
AIMS: To describe the clinicopathological features of florid peritoneal mesothelial hyperplasia associated with gynaecological disease. METHODS: Review of a series of 44 cases where there was significant peritoneal mesothelial proliferation, usually on the surface of the ovary, which resulted in diagnostic problems, often including a consideration of malignancy. RESULTS: Florid mesothelial proliferation was associated with a variety of benign and malignant lesions, most commonly endometriosis. The most characteristic morphological appearance was that of small bland tubules and nests and cords of cells often embedded in fibrous tissue, sometimes with a linear arrangement. In a minority of cases, there were closely packed small glands and papillae resulting in mimicry of a serous proliferation; psammoma bodies were present in one such case. In several cases, the groups of mesothelial cells either exhibited true lymphovascular invasion or were surrounded by spaces closely simulating lymphovascular invasion. Although most cases were appreciated to represent a reactive mesothelial proliferation, several were referred with a presumed or possible diagnosis of mesothelioma, low-grade serous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenomatoid tumour or Sertoli cell tumour. Positive staining with calretinin and negative staining with Ber-EP4 often helped to identify the cells as mesothelial rather than epithelial. CONCLUSIONS: Florid peritoneal mesothelial hyperplasia can occur in association with a variety of gynaecological disorders. Recognition of this phenomenon and appreciation that it can produce worrisome histological patterns, particularly when associated with endometriosis, is key to reaching the correct diagnosis.
Authors: W Glenn McCluggage; Meagan J Judge; Blaise A Clarke; Ben Davidson; C Blake Gilks; Harry Hollema; Jonathan A Ledermann; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Yoshiki Mikami; Colin J R Stewart; Russell Vang; Lynn Hirschowitz Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Luigi Vimercati; Domenica Cavone; Maria Celeste Delfino; Biagio Bruni; Luigi De Maria; Antonio Caputi; Stefania Sponselli; Roberta Rossi; Leonardo Resta; Francesco Fortarezza; Federica Pezzuto; Gabriella Serio Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Stephen R Armstrong; Rashmi Narendrula; Baoqing Guo; Amadeo M Parissenti; Katherine L McCallum; Stephanie Cull; Carita Lannér Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 4.234