Literature DB >> 21421102

A prospective study of prophylactic long-acting octreotide in high-risk patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Jay A Graham1, Lynt B Johnson, Naddim Haddad, Firas Al-Kawas, John Carroll, Reena Jha, Jason Wong, Dana Maglaris, Shea Mertens, Thomas Fishbein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (postoperative pancreatic fistula [POPF]) is the most common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Despite some studies showing little effect of octreotide in unselected patients, we hypothesized that in high-risk patients depot octreotide may reduce the risk of POPF.
METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were prospectively evaluated for inclusion in the current study. Two groups were identified: pancreatic ducts ≤3 mm (high risk) and those with ducts >3 mm (low risk). Thirty-two patients were low risk, whereas 36 patients were high risk. High-risk patients were treated preoperatively with depot octreotide and begun on an intravenous drip for 24 hours. Low-risk patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy without pharmacologic intervention. In contrast, the control cohort represents 106 retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy without depot octreotide injection without regard to low- or high-risk status.
RESULTS: Overall, POPF was 11 of 68 (16%). Nine of 36 high risk patients treated with depot octreotide developed POPF (25%), and 2 of 32 low risk patients developed POPF (6%). In the control cohort of high-risk patients, 9 of 44 (20%) and 3 of 62 (5%) low-risk patients developed POPF (P = .628 when comparing the development of POPF in high-risk patients with or without pharmacologic intervention).
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of depot octreotide in high-risk patients does not result in reduced incidence of POPF. Duct size has a significant impact on the occurrence of POPF.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421102     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

Review 1.  Duct-to-Mucosa Versus Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Hua; Zhigang He; Daohai Qian; Hongbo Meng; Bo Zhou; Zhenshun Song
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany.

Authors:  Christina Haane; Wolf Arif Mardin; Britta Schmitz; Sameer Dhayat; Richard Hummel; Norbert Senninger; Christina Schleicher; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Prophylactic octreotide for pancreatoduodenectomy: more harm than good?

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; John D Christein; Mark P Callery; Stephen W Behrman; Jeffrey A Drebin; Tara S Kent; Benjamin C Miller; Russell S Lewis; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kawaida; Hiroshi Kono; Naohiro Hosomura; Hidetake Amemiya; Jun Itakura; Hideki Fujii; Daisuke Ichikawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Anastomosis technique for pancreatojejunostomy and early removal of drainage tubes may reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kawaida; Hiroshi Kono; Hidetake Amemiya; Naohiro Hosomura; Mitsuaki Watanabe; Ryo Saito; Yuuki Nakata; Katsutoshi Shoda; Hiroki Shimizu; Shinji Furuya; Hidenori Akaike; Yoshihiko Kawaguchi; Makoto Sudo; Masanori Matusda; Jun Itakura; Hideki Fujii; Daisuke Ichikawa
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Selection of pancreaticojejunostomy technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: duct-to-mucosa anastomosis is not better than invagination anastomosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Ting Li; Bin Wang; Yunxiao Cheng; Sicong Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.