Literature DB >> 21420709

Escherichia coli, enterococci, and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron qPCR signals through wastewater and septage treatment.

Sangeetha Srinivasan1, Asli Aslan, Irene Xagoraraki, Evangelyn Alocilja, Joan B Rose.   

Abstract

Fecal indicators such as Escherichia coli and enterococci are used as regulatory tools to monitor water with 24 h cultivation techniques for possible input of sewage or feces and presence of potential enteric pathogens yet their source (human or animal) cannot be determined with routine methods. This critical uncertainty has furthered water pollution science toward new molecular approaches. Members of Bacteroides genus, such as Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron are found to have features that allow their use as alternative fecal indicators and for Microbial Source Tracking (MST). The overall aim of this study was to evaluate the concentration and fate of B. thetaiotaomicron, throughout a wastewater treatment facility and septage treatment facility. A large number of samples were collected and tested for E. coli and enterococci by both cultivation and qPCR assays. B. thetaiotaomicron qPCR equivalent cells (mean: 1.8 × 10(7)/100 mL) were present in significantly higher concentrations than E. coli or enterococci in raw sewage and at the same levels in raw septage. The removal of B. thetaiotaomicron target qPCR signals was similar to E. coli and enterococci DNA during the treatment of these wastes and ranged from 3 to 5 log(10) for wastewater and was 7 log(10) for the septage. A significant correlation was found between B. thetaiotaomicron marker and each of the conventional indicators throughout the waste treatment process for both raw sewage and septage. A greater variability was found with enterococci when compared to E. coli, and CFU and equivalent cells could be contrasted by various treatment processes to examine removal and inactivation via septage and wastewater treatment. These results are compared and contrasted with other qPCR studies and other targets in wastewater samples providing a view of DNA targets in such environments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21420709     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  15 in total

1.  A perspective on the prevalence of DNA enteric virus genomes in anaerobic-digested biological wastes.

Authors:  Kelvin Wong; Irene Xagoraraki
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome.

Authors:  Torey Looft; Timothy A Johnson; Heather K Allen; Darrell O Bayles; David P Alt; Robert D Stedtfeld; Woo Jun Sul; Tiffany M Stedtfeld; Benli Chai; James R Cole; Syed A Hashsham; James M Tiedje; Thad B Stanton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Differential decomposition of bacterial and viral fecal indicators in common human pollution types.

Authors:  Pauline Wanjugi; Mano Sivaganesan; Asja Korajkic; Catherine A Kelty; Brian McMinn; Robert Ulrich; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Distribution of genetic markers of fecal pollution on a freshwater sandy shoreline in proximity to wastewater effluent.

Authors:  Jessica J Eichmiller; Randall E Hicks; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Linking fecal bacteria in rivers to landscape, geochemical, and hydrologic factors and sources at the basin scale.

Authors:  Marc P Verhougstraete; Sherry L Martin; Anthony D Kendall; David W Hyndman; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bacterial pathogens and community composition in advanced sewage treatment systems revealed by metagenomics analysis based on high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Xu-Xiang Zhang; Zhu Wang; Kailong Huang; Yuan Wang; Weigang Liang; Yunfei Tan; Bo Liu; Junying Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Aquaculture can promote the presence and spread of antibiotic-resistant Enterococci in marine sediments.

Authors:  Andrea Di Cesare; Gian Marco Luna; Carla Vignaroli; Sonia Pasquaroli; Sara Tota; Paolo Paroncini; Francesca Biavasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Distribution and abundance of human-specific Bacteroides and relation to traditional indicators in an urban tropical catchment.

Authors:  J P Nshimyimana; E Ekklesia; P Shanahan; L H C Chua; J R Thompson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Effects of Bacillus subtilis KN-42 on Growth Performance, Diarrhea and Faecal Bacterial Flora of Weaned Piglets.

Authors:  Yuanliang Hu; Yaohao Dun; Shenao Li; Shumiao Zhao; Nan Peng; Yunxiang Liang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Multiple approaches to microbial source tracking in tropical northern Australia.

Authors:  Matthew Neave; Heidi Luter; Anna Padovan; Simon Townsend; Xavier Schobben; Karen Gibb
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.