| Literature DB >> 21420493 |
Jennifer L Gill1, Deborah Capper, Jean-François Vanbellinghen, Seo-Kyung Chung, Robert J Higgins, Mark I Rees, G Diane Shelton, Robert J Harvey.
Abstract
Defects in glycinergic synaptic transmission in humans, cattle, and rodents result in an exaggerated startle reflex and hypertonia in response to either acoustic or tactile stimuli. Molecular genetic studies have determined that mutations in the genes encoding the postsynaptic glycine receptor (GlyR) α1 and β subunits (GLRA1 and GLRB) and the presynaptic glycine transporter GlyT2 (SLC6A5) are the major cause of these disorders. Here, we report the first genetically confirmed canine cases of startle disease. A litter of seven Irish wolfhounds was identified in which two puppies developed muscle stiffness and tremor in response to handling. Although sequencing of GLRA1 and GLRB did not reveal any pathogenic mutations, analysis of SLC6A5 revealed a homozygous 4.2kb microdeletion encompassing exons 2 and 3 in both affected animals. This results in the loss of part of the large cytoplasmic N-terminus and all subsequent transmembrane domains due to a frameshift. This genetic lesion was confirmed by defining the deletion breakpoint, Southern blotting, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). This analysis enabled the development of a rapid genotyping test that revealed heterozygosity for the deletion in the dam and sire and three other siblings, confirming recessive inheritance. Wider testing of related animals has identified a total of 13 carriers of the SLC6A5 deletion as well as non-carrier animals. These findings will inform future breeding strategies and enable a rational pharmacotherapy of this new canine disorder.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21420493 PMCID: PMC4068303 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Dis ISSN: 0969-9961 Impact factor: 5.996
Startle disorders in livestock and companion animals.
| Genetics: Autosomal recessive inheritance. Nonsense mutation (c.C156A, p.Y24X) in exon 2 of |
| Genetics: Autosomal recessive inheritance. Missense mutation (c.C156A, p.Y24X; c.T809C, p.L270P) in exon 4 of |
| Genetics: Likely autosomal recessive inheritance. Genetic lesion unknown, although likely to be a mutation in |
| Genetics: Likely autosomal recessive inheritance. Genetic lesion unknown. Clinical signs: At six weeks old, three Labrador retrievers presented with muscle rigidity triggered by voluntary movements or handling, and respiratory distress was observed in severe episodes. Electromyogram analysis revealed increased motor unit amplitude with polyphasic action potentials without myotonic discharges. Normal serum chemistry, urinalysis, and muscle biopsies. Reference: |
Fig. 1PCR assays reveal that a SLC6A5 microdeletion is associated with startle disease in Irish wolfhounds. (A) Photograph of one of two affected puppies demonstrating lateral recumbency and an extended posture (see Video S1 online). (B) PCR panels for SLC6A5 exon 2 (754 bp), exon 3 (513 bp), and a large genomic fragment encompassing exons 1–4 (target size, 8.2 kb). Note that exon 2 and exon 3 fragments fail to amplify from the affected dogs (samples and 1 and 2, −/−) but can be robustly amplified using genomic DNA from the dam and five other siblings. Although the 8.2 kb exon 1–4 fragment was not amplified from wild-type animals or carriers (due to the large size and GC-rich nature of the amplicon), a 4 kb PCR product was observed in both affected dogs (−/−), the dam, and three of the littermates (sibs 1, 4, and 5—all likely to have a +/− genotype). (C) Since exons 1 and 4–16 were amplified from affected animals, these results strongly suggest that a microdeletion encompassing SLC6A5 exons 2 and 3 is the genetic cause of this startle disorder, with the two remaining animals (sibs 2 and 3) being homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+).
Fig. 3Combined pedigree analysis and genotyping reveals additional SLC6A5 microdeletion carriers. Pedigree analysis combined with PCR genotyping of exon 2, 3, and microdeletion amplicons (see Fig. 1) allowed the identification of a total of 13 heterozygous carriers and 2 additional suspected carriers (dam 1 and dam 5). Notably, we were able to offer rapid diagnostic genotyping for the large litter from dam 4 and sire 4, allowing the owner to manage future breeding strategy. By distinguishing phenotypically identical carriers (+/−) from normal (+/+) animals, this disorder can effectively be eliminated from breeding stock in a single generation. It is also noteworthy that three offspring of sire 5 died unexpectedly, suggesting that dam 5 may also be a carrier of the SLC6A5 microdeletion. For genotypes in brackets, DNA samples were not available and genotypes are suggested rather than categorically proven.
Fig. 4Confirmation of the SLC6A5 deletion using Southern blotting and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. (A) Southern blotting of genomic DNA digested with HindIII and probed with the exon 1 PCR amplicon is predicted to reveal a 6672 bp fragment in wild-type animals and a 2242 bp fragment in animals harboring the microdeletion. The observed sizes and banding patterns of DNA fragments hybridizing with the exon 1 probe are in good agreement with these values in wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/−), and homozygous affected (−/−) animals. (B, C) MLPA analysis also reveals robust detection of control probes (CFTRa and CFTRb), probes for SLC6A5 exons 1, 4, and 5. However, signals for probes in intron 2 (just downstream of the GC rich exon 2) and exon 3 were reduced by 35%–60% in heterozygous (+/−) animals and abolished in homozygous animals (−/−) consistent with a loss of probe binding sites in genomic DNA.