Literature DB >> 21420144

Hand biomechanics during simulated stone tool use.

Campbell Rolian1, Daniel E Lieberman, John Paul Zermeno.   

Abstract

Human radial digits have derived features compared with apes, with long robust thumbs, relatively larger joint surfaces, and hypertrophic thenar muscles. Here we test the hypothesis that these features evolved in the context of making and using stone tools, specifically for producing large gripping forces and for countering large joint contact stresses. We used portable force plates simulating early stone tools to: 1) document and compare the magnitude of external/internal forces and joint stresses in the radial digits during hardhammer percussion and flake use, and 2) examine how variation in digit morphology affects muscle and joint mechanics during stone tool use. Force and kinematic data were collected from a sample representing normal variation in digit morphology (n = 25). The effects of digit size/shape on digit biomechanics were evaluated using partial correlations, controlling for tool reaction forces and impact velocities. Results show that individuals with longer digits require relatively less muscle force to stabilize digital joints, and are exposed to relatively lower joint contact stresses during stone tool use, due in part to an increase in the robusticity of metacarpals and phalanges in humans relative to chimpanzees. These analyses further suggest that Pan- or australopith-like pollical anatomy presents serious performance challenges to habitual tool use. Our data support the hypothesis that evolutionary increases in thumb length, robusticity, and thenar muscle mass enabled Homo to produce more force and to tolerate higher joint stresses during tool use.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21420144     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  20 in total

1.  Prehension kinematics in humans and macaques.

Authors:  Yuke Yan; Anton R Sobinov; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 2.  Tool making, hand morphology and fossil hominins.

Authors:  Mary W Marzke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Evidence in hand: recent discoveries and the early evolution of human manual manipulation.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental 'preferential' Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes.

Authors:  Metin I Eren; Stephen J Lycett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechanical analysis of avian feet: multiarticular muscles in grasping and perching.

Authors:  Spencer B Backus; Diego Sustaita; Lael U Odhner; Aaron M Dollar
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Tool use ability depends on understanding of functional dynamics and not specific joint contribution profiles.

Authors:  Ross Parry; Gilles Dietrich; Blandine Bril
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-23

7.  The hand of Homo naledi.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Andrew S Deane; Matthew W Tocheri; Caley M Orr; Peter Schmid; John Hawks; Lee R Berger; Steven E Churchill
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Morphometric Assessment of Convergent Tool Technology and Function during the Early Middle Palaeolithic: The Case of Payre, France.

Authors:  M Gema Chacón; Florent Détroit; Aude Coudenneau; Marie-Hélène Moncel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Manual Loading Distribution During Carrying Behaviors: Implications for the Evolution of the Hominin Hand.

Authors:  Alastair J M Key
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates.

Authors:  Antoine Muller; Chris Clarkson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.