Literature DB >> 21419887

Early and late (one year) outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (from the United States REVIVAL trial).

Susheel K Kodali1, William W O'Neill, Jeffrey W Moses, Mathew Williams, Craig R Smith, Murat Tuzcu, Lars G Svensson, Samir Kapadia, George Hanzel, Ajay J Kirtane, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Cribier-Edwards prosthesis may provide an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Previous studies have indicated that TAVI is feasible in this patient population. Transcatheter implantation of a Cribier-Edwards prosthesis was attempted in 55 patients in a United States Food and Drug Administration-approved prospective observational study. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were assessed in hospital and at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months. Fifty-five patients (55% women, mean age 83 years) with a mean aortic valve area of 0.57 ± 0.14 cm(2) and a mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score of 33.5 ± 17.0% were enrolled. Transcatheter heart valves were implanted successfully in 48 patients (87%). Mean echocardiographic aortic valve area improved from 0.56 ± 0.14 to 1.6 ± 0.48 cm(2) after the procedure (p <0.0001). Thirty-day all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were 7.3% and 20%, respectively. There were also 7 major procedural vascular complications (12.7%). Mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events increased to 23.6% and 32.7%, respectively, at 1 year, with most late events related to underlying co-morbidities. Mean New York Heart Association functional class improved from 3.22 ± 0.66 at baseline to 1.50 ± 0.85 at 1 year follow-up (p <0.001). In conclusion, TAVI in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis was feasible, with sustained clinical benefit at 12 months. Procedural complications and late major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, however, overshadowed the overall clinical benefit of TAVI in this high-risk patient population.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419887     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of multicenter registries and randomized control trials for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; E Murat Tuzcu; William Stewart; Navkaranbir Singh Bajaj; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-07-10

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation despite challenging vascular access.

Authors:  Angelo Nascimbene; Federico Azpurua; James J Livesay; R David Fish; Zvonimir Krajcer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 3.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comprehensive Review and Present Status.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; Jacob A Misenheimer; Radhakrishnan Ramaraj
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  3-year outcomes of self-expanding Corevalve prosthesis - The Italian Registry.

Authors:  Marco Barbanti; Gian Paolo Ussia; Stefano Cannata; Alessandra Giarratana; Carmelo Sgroi; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Transapical aortic valve implantation with anatomically oriented prostheses.

Authors:  Simon Sündermann; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

6.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement-state of the art and a glimpse to the future: 'the Tailored Approach'.

Authors:  Francesco Bedogni; Alessandro Frigiola; Marco Ranucci; Nedy Brambilla; Rocco Antonio Montone; Mauro Agnifili; Lorenzo Menicanti; Luca Testa
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: an updated review of literature.

Authors:  Saurav Chatterjee; Dharam Jaydeep Kumbhani; Partha Sardar; Anasua Chakraborty; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Manpreet Singh Sabharwal; Richard Ro; Balaji Pratap; Chirag P Bavishi; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Clinical efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients: the PREVAIL JAPAN trial.

Authors:  Yoshiki Sawa; Morimasa Takayama; Kazuaki Mitsudo; Shinsuke Nanto; Shuichiro Takanashi; Tatsuhiko Komiya; Toru Kuratani; Tetsuya Tobaru; Tsuyoshi Goto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Unfavorable Aortoiliofemoral Anatomy.

Authors:  Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.