Literature DB >> 21419656

Early complications and immediate postoperative outcomes of paravalvular leaks after valve replacement surgery.

Marcin Wąsowicz1, Massimiliano Meineri, George Djaiani, Nicholas Mitsakakis, Nasr Hegazi, Wei Xu, Rita Katznelson, Jacek M Karski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of perivalvular leaks (PVLs) after valve replacement and assess its impact on immediate postoperative outcomes.
DESIGN: A retrospective review. SETTINGS: A tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred forty-two consecutive patients undergoing aortic (AVR) and/or mitral (MVR) valve replacement.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients had comprehensive intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography was performed at 5 to 7 days and 1 year after surgery. PVLs were classified as trace, mild, moderate, and severe. Perioperative variables including demographic data, surgical characteristics including the degree of valve calcification, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without PVLs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the variables predictive of PVLs. PVLs were identified in a total of 53 (12%) patients, 29 (13%) after MVR and 24 (11%) after AVR. At the 1-year transthoracic echocardiographic follow-up, 2 (7%) of 27 patients had residual PVLs after MVR and none after AVR. The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was predictive of PVLs. The presence of PVLs was associated with postoperative sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PVLs was similar after MVR and AVR. Bioprosthetic MVR and mechanical AVR were associated with higher-incidence PVLs when compared with controls. Mitral annular calcification was a potential risk factor for PVLs with bioprosthetic valves. The prolonged CPB time was predictive of PVLs. After adjusting for covariates, the overall presence of PVLs was associated with an increased risk of sepsis after surgery. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419656     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

Review 1.  Guidance of treatment of perivalvular prosthetic leaks.

Authors:  Daniel Rodríguez Muñoz; Carla Lázaro Rivera; José Luis Zamorano Gómez
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  On the Mechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Hoda Hatoum; Arash Kheradvar; Ramin Zareian; S Hamed Alavi; Wei Sun; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham; Qian Wang; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Review of Prosthetic Paravalvular Leaks: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Tarek Helmy; Sundeep Kumar; Abdul A Khan; Ali Raza; Steven Smart; Steven R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.955

4.  Early postoperative paravalvular leak among Egyptian population: An observational study.

Authors:  Noha Hassanin; Yasser Sharaf; Waleed Ammar; Amr Y H Sayed
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 5.  Para-prosthetic Leaks Following Mitral Valve Replacement: Case Analysis on a 20-year Period.

Authors:  Melvin Dziubek; Charalampos Pierrakos; Louis Chebli; Helene Demanet; Ahmed Sanoussi; Pierre Wauthy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018-03-14

6.  Perpendicular and turbulent flow after aortic valve replacement: paravalvular or transvalvular leakage? - a case report.

Authors:  Shihoko Iwata; Chiaki Inano; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.