Justin Stebbing1, Sarah Ngan. 1. The Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Median survival from metastatic breast cancer is 12 months without treatment, but young people can survive up to 20 years with the disease, whereas in other metastatic cancers this would be considered unusual. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of first-line hormonal treatment? What are the effects of second-line hormonal treatment in women who have not responded to tamoxifen? What are the effects of first-line chemotherapy? What are the effects of first-line chemotherapy in combination with a monoclonal antibody? What are the effects of second-line chemotherapy? What are the effects of treatments for bone metastases? What are the effects of treatments for spinal cord metastases? What are the effects of treatments for cerebral or choroidal metastases? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 77 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: first-line hormonal treatment using anti-oestrogens (tamoxifen), ovarian ablation, progestins, selective aromatase inhibitors, or combined gonadorelin analogues plus tamoxifen; second-line hormonal treatment using progestins or selective aromatase inhibitors; first-line non-taxane combination chemotherapy; first-line taxane-based combination chemotherapy; first-line high- versus low-dose standard chemotherapy; first-line chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab, trastuzumab); first-line chemotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib); second-line taxane-based combination chemotherapy; second-line capecitabine or semi-synthetic vinca alkaloids for anthracycline-resistant disease; second-line chemotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib); and treatment for bone, spinal, or choroidal metastases using bisphosphonates, intrathecal chemotherapy, radiotherapy (alone or plus corticosteroids) radiation sensitisers, or surgical resection.
INTRODUCTION: Median survival from metastatic breast cancer is 12 months without treatment, but young people can survive up to 20 years with the disease, whereas in other metastatic cancers this would be considered unusual. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of first-line hormonal treatment? What are the effects of second-line hormonal treatment in women who have not responded to tamoxifen? What are the effects of first-line chemotherapy? What are the effects of first-line chemotherapy in combination with a monoclonal antibody? What are the effects of second-line chemotherapy? What are the effects of treatments for bone metastases? What are the effects of treatments for spinal cord metastases? What are the effects of treatments for cerebral or choroidal metastases? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 77 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: first-line hormonal treatment using anti-oestrogens (tamoxifen), ovarian ablation, progestins, selective aromatase inhibitors, or combined gonadorelin analogues plus tamoxifen; second-line hormonal treatment using progestins or selective aromatase inhibitors; first-line non-taxane combination chemotherapy; first-line taxane-based combination chemotherapy; first-line high- versus low-dose standard chemotherapy; first-line chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab, trastuzumab); first-line chemotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib); second-line taxane-based combination chemotherapy; second-line capecitabine or semi-synthetic vinca alkaloids for anthracycline-resistant disease; second-line chemotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib); and treatment for bone, spinal, or choroidal metastases using bisphosphonates, intrathecal chemotherapy, radiotherapy (alone or plus corticosteroids) radiation sensitisers, or surgical resection.
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse; George Sledge; James Carmichael; Hans-Joachim Lück; John R Mackey; Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Robert Paridaens; Laura Biganzoli; Jacek Jassem; Marijke Bontenbal; Jacques Bonneterre; Stephen Chan; Gul Atalay Basaran; Patrick Therasse Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert J Paridaens; Luc Y Dirix; Louk V Beex; Marianne Nooij; David A Cameron; Tanja Cufer; Martine J Piccart; Jan Bogaerts; Patrick Therasse Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew D Seidman; Donald Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Lyndsay Harris; Hyman Muss; P Kelly Marcom; Grandella Gipson; Harold Burstein; Diana Lake; Charles L Shapiro; Peter Ungaro; Larry Norton; Eric Winer; Clifford Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yoseph W Dance; Tova Meshulam; Alex J Seibel; Mackenzie C Obenreder; Matthew D Layne; Celeste M Nelson; Joe Tien Journal: Cell Mol Bioeng Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Wei Zheng; Fariba Tayyari; G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery; Eric S McLamore; Jin Shi; D Marshall Porterfield; Shawn S Donkin; Brian Bequette; Dorothy Teegarden Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: J Stebbing; H Zhang; Y Xu; L C Lit; A R Green; A Grothey; Y Lombardo; M Periyasamy; K Blighe; W Zhang; J A Shaw; I O Ellis; H J Lenz; G Giamas Journal: Oncogene Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Wendy W T Lam; Ava Kwong; Dacita Suen; Janice Tsang; Inda Soong; Tze Kok Yau; Winnie Yeo; Joyce Suen; Wing Ming Ho; Ka Yan Wong; Wing Kin Sze; Alice W Y Ng; Richard Fielding Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.430