Literature DB >> 21418473

Laparoscopic resection for colorectal polyps: a single institution experience.

Jiunn-Herng Lai1, Kheng-Hong Ng, Boon-Swee Ooi, Kok-Sun Ho, Jit-Fong Lim, Choong-Leong Tang, Kong-Weng Eu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic polypectomy, although routinely used for the treatment of colorectal polyps, may be limited by polyp size, location and histology. Laparoscopic resection for malignant polyps and polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal has the advantage of adequate disease clearance as well as the short-term benefits of laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates the outcomes of such an approach.
METHODS: Patients who had laparoscopic resection for colorectal polyps between January 2005 and July 2008 were identified from a prospective database. Polyps that were malignant, large, difficult to snare or incompletely excised, were included. Demographics, perioperative details and histopathology were analysed.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (44 male) with a median age of 62.5 years (range 24-86) were studied. The majority (79%) were laparoscopic anterior resections for sigmoid or rectal polyps. Median operating time was 125 min (range, 65-225). Eight cases (10.3%) were converted to open mainly due to adhesions. There was no post-operative mortality. Perioperative complications occurred in seven patients (8.9%). Median hospital stay was 6 days (range 4-78). Median polyp size was 20 mm (range, 5-75). There were 44 benign polyps (55.7%); majority were tubulovillous adenomas (n= 22), and tubular adenomas (n= 10). Thirty-five patients (44.3%) had invasive cancer, with T1 (n= 27) and T2 (n= 2) tumours. Three of these patients (8.6%) had lymph node metastases. Median number of lymph nodes sampled was six (range 0-23).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection is safe and effective for colorectal polyps not amenable to colonoscopic removal, and is especially important for adequate clearance in the case of malignant polyps.
© 2010 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2010 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21418473     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

Review 1.  Avoiding colorectal resection for polyps: is CELS the best method?

Authors:  Kentaro Nakajima; Sameer K Sharma; Sang W Lee; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Sophie Sf Hon; Simon Sm Ng; Tiffany Cl Wong; Philip Wy Chiu; Tony Wc Mak; W W Leung; Janet Fy Lee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-25

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal polyps: single institution experience.

Authors:  Audrius Dulskas; Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius; Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Vaidotas Zabulis
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 4.  Is There an Indication for Surgical Resection in Colorectal Adenoma?

Authors:  Stefan Rüth; Johann Spatz; Matthias Anthuber
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.