Literature DB >> 21418429

The British research evidence for recovery, papers published between 2006 and 2009 (inclusive). Part two: a review of the grey literature including book chapters and policy documents.

T Stickley1, N Wright.   

Abstract

This paper is the second in a series of two which reviews the current UK evidence base for recovery in mental health. As outlined in the previous paper, over the last 4 years a vast amount has written about recovery in mental health (approximately 60% of all articles). Whereas the first review focused on the peer-reviewed evidence; this paper specifically focuses on the grey/non-peer-reviewed literature. In total, our search strategy yielded the following: 3 books, a further 11 book chapters, 12 papers, 6 policy documents and 3 publications from voluntary sector organizations. Each group of publications was analysed for content, and they are discursively presented by publication group. The findings are then presented as themes in the discussion section. The themes are: social, historical and political critique; philosophy of hope for the individual; individual identity and narrative; models and guidance for mental health practice. We conclude that there is a need for both empirical research into recovery and a clearer theoretical exposition of the concept.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21418429     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  5 in total

Review 1.  International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.

Authors:  M Slade; M Leamy; F Bacon; M Janosik; C Le Boutillier; J Williams; V Bird
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  The self-management of longer-term depression: learning from the patient, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eleni Chambers; Sarah Cook; Anna Thake; Alexis Foster; Sue Shaw; Rebecca Hutten; Glenys Parry; Tom Ricketts
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Squaring the circle: a priority-setting method for evidence-based service development, reconciling research with multiple stakeholder views.

Authors:  Rebecca Hutten; Glenys D Parry; Thomas Ricketts; Jo Cooke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  A meta-recovery framework: positioning the 'New Recovery' movement and other recovery approaches.

Authors:  G Winship
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  Care Coordination as Imagined, Care Coordination as Done: Findings from a Cross-national Mental Health Systems Study.

Authors:  Ben Hannigan; Alan Simpson; Michael Coffey; Sally Barlow; Aled Jones
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.120

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.