Literature DB >> 21418208

Soil nutrient status determines how elephant utilize trees and shape environments.

Yolanda Pretorius1, Fred W de Boer, Cornelis van der Waal, Henjo J de Knegt, Rina C Grant, Nicky M Knox, Edward M Kohi, Emmanuel Mwakiwa, Bruce R Page, Mike J S Peel, Andrew K Skidmore, Rob Slotow, Sipke E van Wieren, Herbert H T Prins.   

Abstract

1. Elucidation of the mechanism determining the spatial scale of patch selection by herbivores has been complicated by the way in which resource availability at a specific scale is measured and by vigilance behaviour of the herbivores themselves. To reduce these complications, we studied patch selection by an animal with negligible predation risk, the African elephant. 2. We introduce the concept of nutrient load as the product of patch size, number of patches and local patch nutrient concentration. Nutrient load provides a novel spatially explicit expression of the total available nutrients a herbivore can select from. 3. We hypothesized that elephant would select nutrient-rich patches, based on the nutrient load per 2500 m(2) down to the individual plant scale, and that this selection will depend on the nitrogen and phosphorous contents of plants. 4. We predicted that elephant would cause more adverse impact to trees of lower value to them in order to reach plant parts with higher nutrient concentrations such as bark and root. However, elephant should maintain nutrient-rich trees by inducing coppicing of trees through re-utilization of leaves. 5. Elephant patch selection was measured in a homogenous tree species stand by manipulating the spatial distribution of soil nutrients in a large field experiment using NPK fertilizer. 6. Elephant were able to select nutrient-rich patches and utilized Colophospermum mopane trees inside these patches more than outside, at scales ranging from 2500 down to 100 m(2) . 7. Although both nitrogen and phosphorus contents of leaves from C. mopane trees were higher in fertilized and selected patches, patch choice correlated most strongly with nitrogen content. As predicted, stripping of leaves occurred more in nutrient-rich patches, while adverse impact such as uprooting of trees occurred more in nutrient-poor areas. 8. Our results emphasize the necessity of including scale-dependent selectivity in foraging studies and how elephant foraging behaviour can be used as indicators of change in the availability of nutrients.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21418208     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01819.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  4 in total

1.  Defence strategies in African savanna trees.

Authors:  Benjamin J Wigley; Hervé Fritz; Corli Coetsee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) as an example of a herbivore making movement choices based on nutritional needs.

Authors:  Fiona Sach; Ellen S Dierenfeld; Simon C Langley-Evans; Michael J Watts; Lisa Yon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Usual populations, unusual individuals: insights into the behavior and management of Asian elephants in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Nishant M Srinivasaiah; Vijay D Anand; Srinivas Vaidyanathan; Anindya Sinha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Scale-dependent bi-trophic interactions in a semi-arid savanna: how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plants.

Authors:  Cornelis van der Waal; Hans de Kroon; Frank van Langevelde; Willem F de Boer; Ignas M A Heitkönig; Rob Slotow; Yolanda Pretorius; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.