Literature DB >> 21417500

Today's challenges in pharmacovigilance: what can we learn from epoetins?

Hans C Ebbers1, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Ellen H M Moors, Huub Schellekens, Hubert G Leufkens.   

Abstract

Highly publicized safety issues of medicinal products in recent years and the accompanying political pressure have forced both the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to implement stronger regulations concerning pharmacovigilance. These legislative changes demand more proactive risk management strategies of both pharmaceutical companies and regulators to characterize and minimize known and potential safety concerns. Concurrently, comprehensive surveillance systems are implemented, intended to identify and confirm adverse drug reactions, including the creation of large pharmacovigilance databases and the cooperation with epidemiological centres. Although the ambitions are high, not much is known about how effective all these measures are, or will be. In this review we analyse how the pharmacovigilance community has acted upon two adverse events associated with the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: the sudden increase in pure red cell aplasia and the possible risk of tumour progression associated with these products. These incidents provide important insight for improving pharmacovigilance, but also pose new challenges for regulatory decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21417500     DOI: 10.2165/11586350-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  66 in total

Review 1.  Clarification of terminology in drug safety.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma associated with infliximab use in young patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Ann Corken Mackey; Lanh Green; Li-Ching Liang; Patricia Dinndorf; Mark Avigan
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Signal detection: historical background.

Authors:  Toine C G Egberts
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Managing drug-risk information--what to do with all those new numbers.

Authors:  Jerry Avorn; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels with epoetin alfa in mainly nonanemic patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a survival study.

Authors:  Brian Leyland-Jones; Vladimir Semiglazov; Marek Pawlicki; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Sergei Tjulandin; George Manikhas; Antoly Makhson; Anton Roth; David Dodwell; Jose Baselga; Mikhail Biakhov; Konstantinas Valuckas; Edouard Voznyi; Xiangyang Liu; Els Vercammen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Anemia as an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer: a systemic, quantitative review.

Authors:  J J Caro; M Salas; A Ward; G Goss
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Effect of erythropoietin on cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  G Sunder-Plassmann; W H Hörl
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  Erythropoietin in cancer patients.

Authors:  John A Glaspy
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.739

9.  Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA): Response of three patients of cyclophosphamide and/or antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) and demonstration of two types of serum IgG inhibitors to erythropoiesis.

Authors:  A Marmont; C Peschle; M Sanguineti; M Condorelli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Johan Vansteenkiste; Robert Pirker; Bartomeu Massuti; Fernando Barata; Albert Font; Michael Fiegl; Salvatore Siena; Jenni Gateley; Dianne Tomita; Alan B Colowick; Jaromir Musil
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Traceability of biopharmaceuticals in spontaneous reporting systems: a cross-sectional study in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases.

Authors:  Niels S Vermeer; Sabine M J M Straus; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Francois Domergue; Toine C G Egberts; Hubert G M Leufkens; Marie L De Bruin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Comparing safety information of biosimilars with their originators: a cross-sectional analysis of European risk management plans.

Authors:  Leroy R A Lepelaars; Francesca Renda; Luca Pani; Giuseppe Pimpinella; Hubert G M Leufkens; Gianluca Trifirò; Giovanni Tafuri; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Francesco Trotta
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Comparative effectiveness and safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (biosimilars vs originators) in clinical practice: a population-based cohort study in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Trotta; Valeria Belleudi; Danilo Fusco; Laura Amato; Alessandra Mecozzi; Flavia Mayer; Massimo Sansone; Marina Davoli; Antonio Addis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Pharmacovigilance in practice: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Authors:  Michael Hedenus; Heinz Ludwig; David H Henry; Eduard Gasal
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Knowledge of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and the Pharmacovigilance of Biological Medicines: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Ireland.

Authors:  J O'Callaghan; B T Griffin; J M Morris; Margaret Bermingham
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.807

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.