Literature DB >> 21416456

The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in course of action planning.

Michael Ziessler1, Dieter Nattkemper.   

Abstract

"Strong" versions of the ideomotor theory of action control claim that anticipations of the environmental effects that actions bring about are mandatory for response selection. This is considered to be the one and only way of how actions can be voluntarily selected. We studied this notion in a series of four experiments where we adapted the flanker paradigm to investigate the involvement of effect codes in the preparation of motor responses. Participants first learned that their responses to stimulus letters were contingently followed by the presentation of a new letter on the screen. In the second phase of the experiments, the action-demanding letters were presented together with the effects of the correct response, effects of other responses, or neutral letters. Varying the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between target stimuli and the flanking effect stimuli provides the opportunity to investigate the temporal dynamics of the activation of effect codes. Hence, flanker stimuli were presented before, simultaneously with, or after the onset of the target. The results indicate that effect-related information from the flanker stimuli is involved in the preparation process, but mainly in later phases of response preparation. The observed pattern of results suggests that, at least under conditions where responses are determined by stimuli, effect codes are activated in course of response planning to enable the evaluation of the executed response and the monitoring of response execution, but they do not automatically activate the responses themselves.
© 2011 The Experimental Psychology Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21416456     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.553067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  9 in total

1.  Action effects in saccade control.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Magali Kreutzfeldt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  The activation of effect codes in response preparation: new evidence from an indirect priming paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Ziessler; Dieter Nattkemper; Stefan Vogt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-31

3.  Using tools with real and imagined tool movements.

Authors:  Jochen Müsseler; Peter Wühr; Michael Ziessler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

4.  Effect Anticipation Affects Perceptual, Cognitive, and Motor Phases of Response Preparation: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study.

Authors:  Neil R Harrison; Michael Ziessler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Self-Generated or Cue-Induced-Different Kinds of Expectations to Be Considered.

Authors:  Maike Kemper; Robert Gaschler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-24

6.  On the influence of reward on action-effect binding.

Authors:  Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Ruth M Krebs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02

7.  Early markers of ongoing action-effect learning.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Ruth M Krebs; Uta Wolfensteller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-27

8.  Specificity of action selection modulates the perceived temporal order of action and sensory events.

Authors:  Andrea Desantis; Patrick Haggard; Yuji Ikegaya; Nobuhiro Hagura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.

Authors:  Erik Friedgen; Iring Koch; Denise Nadine Stephan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.