Literature DB >> 21414692

Differential functioning of mini-mental test items according to disease.

G Prieto1, A R Delgado, M V Perea, V Ladera.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Comparing the height of males and females would be impossible if the measuring device did not have the same properties for both populations. In a similar way, the cognitive level of diverse groups of patients should not be compared if the test has different measurement properties for these groups. Lack of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) is a condition for measurement invariance between populations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The most internationally used screening test for dementia, the MMSE (or Mini-mental State Examination), has been analysed using an advanced psychometric technique, the Rasch Model. The objective was to determine the invariance of mini-mental measurements from diverse groups: Parkinson's disease patients, Alzheimer's type dementia and normal subjects. The hypothesis was that the scores would not show DIF against any of these groups. The total sample was composed of 400 subjects.
RESULTS: Significant differences between groups were found. However, the quantitative comparison only makes sense if no evidence against measurement invariance was found: given the kind of items showing DIF against Parkinson's disease patients, the MMSE seems to underestimate the cognitive level of these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the extended use of this test, 11 items out of 30 show DIF and consequently score comparisons between groups are not justified.
Copyright © 2010 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414692     DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurologia        ISSN: 0213-4853            Impact factor:   3.109


  4 in total

Review 1.  Item response theory analysis of cognitive tests in people with dementia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah McGrory; Jason M Doherty; Elizabeth J Austin; John M Starr; Susan D Shenkin
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 2.  Measurement invariance across chronic conditions: a systematic review and an empirical investigation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™).

Authors:  Michael Schuler; Gunda Musekamp; Jürgen Bengel; Sandra Nolte; Richard H Osborne; Hermann Faller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Spanish Version of the Flourishing Scale (FS) on the Parents of Children With Cancer: A Validation Through Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Pozo Muñoz; Blanca Bretones Nieto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-25

4.  Measuring global functioning in older adults with cognitive impairments using the Rasch model.

Authors:  Rocco Palumbo; Alberto Di Domenico; Federica Piras; Salvatore Bazzano; Mario Zerilli; Fabio Lorico; Erika Borella
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.921

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.