Literature DB >> 21413993

The development of ambiguous figure perception.

.   

Abstract

Ambiguous figures have fascinated researchers for almost 200 years. The physical properties of these figures remain constant, yet two distinct interpretations are possible; these reverse (switch) from one percept to the other. The consensus is that reversal requires complex interaction of perceptual bottom-up and cognitive top-down elements. The specific processes that allow the phenomenal experience of reversal remain mysterious. This monograph has two aims: first, to identify specific processes of the reversal phenomenon by using a developmental approach. Second, to use ambiguous figures as a research tool to shed more light onto children's developing understanding of pictorial representation. Four studies (7 experiments), each involving around sixty 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children, using multiple tasks, yielded the following conclusions. The concept of ambiguity develops between the ages of 3 and 4 (Study 1). Understanding ambiguity requires pictorial metarepresentation and is associated with understanding mental (false beliefs) and linguistic representation (synonymy, homonymy). This suggests a broader conceptual development of representation around the age of 4. The perception of ambiguity develops between 4 and 5 years (Study 2). Within this age range children also develop inhibitory (Study 3) and image generation abilities (Study 4). These are key processes allowing reversal. Further, when task demands are changed (prompted reversal task; feature identification), children's reversal reaches ceiling by the age of 5 (Studies 2, 3, and 4). The conclusion is a two-stage empirical model of reversal: During Stage 1 (between 3 and 4 years), children develop the conception of pictorial ambiguity (top-down knowledge). During Stage 2 (between 4 and 5 years) children develop the necessary additional processes for reversal to occur (inhibition and image generation). These are the key specific top-down and bottom-up developments underlying the phenomenon of ambiguous figure reversal. They correspond to the distinction of ambiguity and reversibility highlighted in adult research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21413993     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00589.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev        ISSN: 0037-976X


  9 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Subthreshold Autistic Traits, Ambiguous Figure Perception and Divergent Thinking.

Authors:  Catherine Best; Shruti Arora; Fiona Porter; Martin Doherty
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-12

2.  Ego depletion in visual perception: Ego-depleted viewers experience less ambiguous figure reversal.

Authors:  Marina C Wimmer; Steven Stirk; Peter J B Hancock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

3.  A meta-analysis of the Dimensional Change Card Sort: Implications for developmental theories and the measurement of executive function in children.

Authors:  Sabine Doebel; Philip David Zelazo
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Children struggle beyond preschool-age in a continuous version of the ambiguous figures task.

Authors:  Eva Rafetseder; Sarah Schuster; Stefan Hawelka; Martin Doherty; Britt Anderson; James Danckert; Elisabeth Stöttinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-12-19

Review 5.  From infants' to children's appreciation of belief.

Authors:  Josef Perner; Johannes Roessler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  How Visuo-Spatial Mental Imagery Develops: Image Generation and Maintenance.

Authors:  Marina C Wimmer; Katie L Maras; Elizabeth J Robinson; Martin J Doherty; Nicolas Pugeault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditory Multi-Stability: Idiosyncratic Perceptual Switching Patterns, Executive Functions and Personality Traits.

Authors:  Dávid Farkas; Susan L Denham; Alexandra Bendixen; Dénes Tóth; Hirohito M Kondo; István Winkler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What's in a Hub?-Representing Identity in Language and Mathematics.

Authors:  Aditi Arora; Belinda Pletzer; Markus Aichhorn; Josef Perner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Hybrid image of three contents.

Authors:  Peeraya Sripian; Yasushi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2020-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.