BACKGROUND: Height and weight information is commonly used in clinical trials and in making therapeutic decisions in medical practice. In both settings, the data are often obtained by self-report. If erroneous, this practice could lead to inaccuracies in estimating renal function and medication doses or to inaccurate outcomes of research studies. Previous publications have reported lack of reliability of self-reported weight and height in the general population but have not addressed age-specific and ethnicity-specific subgroups in the U.S. population. The inaccuracy of self-reported weight and height could be particularly significant in times of considerable changes in body weight, such as at menopause, which is often associated with weight gain. METHODS: We assessed the validity of self-reported height and weight in 428 women within the first 5 years of menopause, 70.6% of whom were Hispanic. RESULTS: Participants overestimated their height by 2.2±3.5 cm (mean±standard deviation [SD]) and underestimated their weight by 1.5±2.9 kg. As a group, based on self-reported measures, 33.3% were misclassified with respect to body mass index (BMI) category, and the difference between measured BMI and self-reported BMI was similar between Hispanic white and non-Hispanic white women, positively related to measured weight, and inversely related to measured height, years from menopause, and multiple parity. CONCLUSIONS: From the public health perspective, inaccurate self-report could lead to a considerable underestimation of the current obesity prevalence rates. In our study population, the prevalence of obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) was 6.3% based on self-reported values and 18% based on measured height and weight, representing a 3-fold underestimation.
BACKGROUND: Height and weight information is commonly used in clinical trials and in making therapeutic decisions in medical practice. In both settings, the data are often obtained by self-report. If erroneous, this practice could lead to inaccuracies in estimating renal function and medication doses or to inaccurate outcomes of research studies. Previous publications have reported lack of reliability of self-reported weight and height in the general population but have not addressed age-specific and ethnicity-specific subgroups in the U.S. population. The inaccuracy of self-reported weight and height could be particularly significant in times of considerable changes in body weight, such as at menopause, which is often associated with weight gain. METHODS: We assessed the validity of self-reported height and weight in 428 women within the first 5 years of menopause, 70.6% of whom were Hispanic. RESULTS:Participants overestimated their height by 2.2±3.5 cm (mean±standard deviation [SD]) and underestimated their weight by 1.5±2.9 kg. As a group, based on self-reported measures, 33.3% were misclassified with respect to body mass index (BMI) category, and the difference between measured BMI and self-reported BMI was similar between Hispanic white and non-Hispanic white women, positively related to measured weight, and inversely related to measured height, years from menopause, and multiple parity. CONCLUSIONS: From the public health perspective, inaccurate self-report could lead to a considerable underestimation of the current obesity prevalence rates. In our study population, the prevalence of obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) was 6.3% based on self-reported values and 18% based on measured height and weight, representing a 3-fold underestimation.
Authors: Majid Ezzati; Hilarie Martin; Suzanne Skjold; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Christopher J L Murray Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; MaryFran R Sowers; Barbara Sternfeld; Ellen B Gold; Joyce Bromberger; Yuefang Chang; Hadine Joffe; Carolyn J Crandall; L Elaine Waetjen; Karen A Matthews Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jiwon Oh; Michaela Seigo; Shiv Saidha; Elias Sotirchos; Kathy Zackowski; Min Chen; Jerry Prince; Marie Diener-West; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes; Whitney R Robinson; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Nora Franceschini; Sheila F Castañeda; Christina Buelna; Ashley Moncrieft; Maria Llabre; Martha L Daviglus; Qibin Qi; Anita Agarwal; Carmen R Isasi; Paul Smokowski; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Kari E North Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Aldo Crossa; Jillian Jessup; Sze Yan Liu; Carmen R Isasi; David B Hanna; Simin Hua; Fangtao He; Amber Levanon Seligson; Sungwoo Lim Journal: Hisp Health Care Int Date: 2020-01-29
Authors: X Chen; H Du; J Zhang; X Chen; G Luo; X Que; N Zhang; Z Bian; Y Guo; L Li; Z Chen; X Wu Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 3.012