Literature DB >> 21412379

Placebo and nocebo in interventional pain management: a friend or a foe--or simply foes?

Laxmaiah Manchikanti1, James Giordano, Bert Fellows, Joshua A Hirsch.   

Abstract

The present evidence illustrates that the placebo effect depends on a variety of neurochemical and neurophysiological mechanisms, which are measurable and modifiable. However, the placebo response is inexorably tied to the treatment context. All medical treatments take place in a particular context; this context includes the therapist's attitudes, psychosocial factors affecting the therapeutic relationship, and the patient's mindset. Therapeutic efficacy at least in part is attributable to the concordance between the proposed treatment and the patient's belief system. It is this fraction of the therapeutic response that is commonly called the placebo effect. More formally, the placebo effect is defined as that part of the therapeutic response that is not attributable to the properties of active ingredients. A proposed model of the placebo effect includes a complex reaction with induction, psychophysiological mediators, neurobiological mediators, and actualization of effects. Similarly, nocebo hyperalgesia is also explained by neurobiological mechanisms resulting in anxiety and nocebo hyperalgesia. Functional neuroanatomy of placebo indicates an anticipation phase and modulation phase or placebo response. In modern medicine it is well recognized that the treatment effect of many active interventions is related to both an active treatment component and the placebo component. Thus, clinical implications are enormous as such placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia are not simply response biases. Instead, they are the product of neurophysiological processes that modulate the integration of the nociceptive signals throughout the central nervous system. Thus, it has been suggested that clinicians should not try to avoid the placebo effect. On the contrary, they should try to potentiate it, since this is a very important clinical implication. From the research perspective, the emerging knowledge of placebo continues to cast doubts on the appropriateness of the double-blind placebo-control design in assessing efficacy of treatment--specifically involving interventional techniques or surgery. The research setting itself may introduce nocebo hyperalgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21412379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  21 in total

1.  Does therapist's attitude affect clinical outcome of lumbar facet joint injections?

Authors:  Marcus Middendorp; Konstantinos Kollias; Hanns Ackermann; Annina Splettstößer; Thomas J Vogl; M Fawad Khan; Adel Maataoui
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 2.  Do Epidural Injections Provide Short- and Long-term Relief for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Ramsin M Benyamin; Frank J E Falco; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Utilization of Facet Joint and Sacroiliac Joint Interventions in Medicare Population from 2000 to 2014: Explosive Growth Continues!

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Vidyasagar Pampati; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Cervical radicular pain: the role of interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Frank J E Falco; Sudhir Diwan; Joshua A Hirsch; Howard S Smith
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

5.  Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Frank Je Falco; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

Review 6.  Epidural injection with or without steroid in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain: ameta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jinshuai Zhai; Long Zhang; Mengya Li; Yiren Tian; Wang Zheng; Jia Chen; Teng Huang; Xicheng Li; Zhi Tian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

7.  Fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome: two-year results of a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Sukdeb Datta
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Fluoroscopic cervical epidural injections in chronic axial or disc-related neck pain without disc herniation, facet joint pain, or radiculitis.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Yogesh Malla
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Management of chronic pain of cervical disc herniation and radiculitis with fluoroscopic cervical interlaminar epidural injections.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Bradley W Wargo; Yogesh Malla
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic axial low back pain without disc herniation, radiculitis, or facet joint pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kimberly A Cash; Carla D McManus; Vidyasagar Pampati
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.