Literature DB >> 21411824

Clinical assessment of low-back-pain treatment outcomes in athletes.

Luzita I Vela1, Douglas E Haladay, Craig Denegar.   

Abstract

PATIENT SCENARIO: A 21-year-old male rodeo athlete complains of acute low back pain (LBP) after a bareback event. The athlete wishes to compete in a rodeo event in 4 d. CLINICAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT: Given the questionable validity and reliability of traditional clinical examination techniques for LBP, a treatment subgroup classification system combined with clinical outcomes assessment provides greater insight into suitable clinical interventions and patient response to treatment. Four LBP treatment subgroups based on the patient's clinical presentation and symptoms have been established: manipulation, stabilization, specific exercise, and traction. Manipulation subgroup research has produced a valid clinical prediction rule (CPR). The Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Global Rating of Change Scale are valid, reliable, and responsive outcomes instruments with established values for minimum clinically important difference (MCID). These instruments document important changes in disablement and health-related quality of life in patients with low back injury, as well as demonstrate treatment outcomes. CLINICAL DECISION MAKING: On examination the athlete presents with moderate pain and disability as measured by the NRS, ODI, and SF-36 and meets all 5 criteria for the manipulation subgroup, indicating a high likelihood of success with manipulative therapy when following the guidelines presented in the CPR. Expected outcomes values, based on MCID values, were met after 1 treatment. Preferred outcomes, based on physical activity requirements for sport, were met on day 4. CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE: LBP generators are difficult to establish using traditional clinical examination techniques. The combined use of clinical criteria, using an LBP subgroup system, and baseline outcomes measures should guide treatment. Benchmarks should be guided by established MCID values for each instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21411824     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.20.1.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  9 in total

1.  Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides' immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Vignesh Bhat P; Vivek Dineshbhai Patel; Charu Eapen; Manisha Shenoy; Steve Milanese
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  The effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with radicular low back pain: Combination of pain provocation with effectiveness results.

Authors:  Emre Adıgüzel; Duygu Tecer; Ümüt Güzelküçük; Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan; Arif Kenan Tan
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-09

3.  Low back pain functional disability in athletes; conceptualization and initial development of a questionnaire.

Authors:  Elham Zamani; Ramin Kordi; Ruhollah Nourian; Negin Noorian; Amir Hossein Memari; Mohammad Shariati
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-10

Review 4.  Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review.

Authors:  Shima Safikhani; Katharine S Gries; Jeremiah J Trudeau; David Reasner; Katja Rüdell; Stephen Joel Coons; Elizabeth Nicole Bush; Jennifer Hanlon; Lucy Abraham; Margaret Vernon
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-06

5.  Effect of muscle energy technique with and without strain-counterstrain technique in acute low back pain - A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Vivek Dineshbhai Patel; Charu Eapen; Zulfeequer Ceepee; Ramachandra Kamath
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2018-04-04

6.  Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Bina Eftekharsadat; Negar Fasaie; Dina Golalizadeh; Arash Babaei-Ghazani; Fatemeh Jahanjou; Yashar Eslampoor; Neda Dolatkhah
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Assessment and classification of peripheral pain in athletes: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Ciarán Purcell; Ciara Duignan; Brona Fullen; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-12-30

8.  The meaning of it all: evaluating knowledge of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) among chiropractic students.

Authors:  Rebecca J Wates; Ike Woodruff; Mark T Pfefer
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-09

Review 9.  Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Susan Armijo-Olivo; William S Shaw; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Nicola T Shaw; Jan Hartvigsen; Ziling Qin; Christine Ha; Linda J Woodhouse; Ivan A Steenstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.