Literature DB >> 21411427

The differing perspectives of workers and occupational medicine physicians on the ethical, legal and social issues of genetic testing in the workplace.

Sherry I Brandt-Rauf, Elka Brandt-Rauf, Robyn Gershon, Paul W Brandt-Rauf.   

Abstract

Genetic testing in the workplace holds the promise of improving worker health but also raises ethical, legal, and social issues. In considering such testing, it is critical to understand the perspectives of workers, who are most directly affected by it, and occupational health professionals, who are often directly involved in its implementation. Therefore, a series of focus groups of unionized workers (n=25) and occupational medicine physicians (n=23) was conducted. The results demonstrated strikingly different perspectives of workers and physicians in several key areas, including the goals and appropriateness of genetic testing, and methods to minimize its risks. In general, workers were guided by a profound mistrust of the employer, physician, and government, while physicians were guided primarily by scientific and medical concerns, and, in many cases, by the business concerns distrusted by the workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21411427     DOI: 10.2190/NS.21.1.j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Solut        ISSN: 1048-2911


  3 in total

1.  Ethical issues of genetic susceptibility testing for occupational diseases: opinions of trainees in a high-risk job.

Authors:  M J Visser; M D F Rhebergen; S Kezic; F J H van Dijk; D L Willems; M M Verberk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Kunal Sanghavi; W Gregory Feero; Debra J H Mathews; Anya E R Prince; Lori Lyn Price; Edison T Liu; Kyle B Brothers; J Scott Roberts; Charles Lee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora's box?

Authors:  Kunal Sanghavi; Betty Cohn; Anya E R Prince; W Gregory Feero; Kerry A Ryan; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Wendy R Uhlmann; Charles Lee; J Scott Roberts; Debra J H Mathews
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.617

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.