Literature DB >> 21411379

Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

A Karim Nawfal1, Mona Orady, David Eisenstein, Ganesa Wegienka.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Henry Ford Health System academic medical center (Henry Ford and Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospitals) PATIENTS: A total of 135 patients who underwent scheduled robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications, without concomitant urogynecologic procedures between January 2008 and June 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy as the intention to treat. Two cases were converted to laparotomy. MEASUREMENTS & MAIN
RESULTS: Electronic medical records of all patients that underwent robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy at Henry Ford Health System were reviewed. Data on demographics, BMI (kg/m(2)), estimated blood loss, perioperative hemoglobin change, procedure duration, hospital length of stay, specimen weight, pathology, and postoperative complications were obtained. The women's median age was 45 years (range 30-68), 61.5% were black, and BMI ranged from 14.8-56.2 kg/m2; 23.4% of women were normal weight or less (BMI <25, n = 31), 52.7% of women were obese (BMI >30, n = 70) and 36 of these patients (27.1%) were morbidly obese (BMI ≥35). BMI did not correlate with procedure duration (Spearman r = .12, p = .16), length of stay (Spearman r = .10, p = .24), or estimated blood loss (Spearman r = .12, p =.18). Our analysis did not identify any meaningful associations between BMI and absolute change in hemoglobin. In addition BMI was not associated with an increase in major or minor complications.
CONCLUSION: BMI is not associated with blood loss, duration of surgery, length of stay, or complication rates in patients undergoing robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Robotic assistance may help surgeons overcome adverse outcomes sometimes found in obese patients.
Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21411379     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  18 in total

1.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

2.  A pilot study of robotic uterine and vaginal vault manipulation: the ViKY Uterine Positioner™.

Authors:  Nikolaos Akrivos; Peter Barton-Smith
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-04-21

3.  Robotics for Pelvic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Olga Ramm; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2011-06-30

4.  Impact of Obesity on Clinical and Financial Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions.

Authors:  Margot Le Neveu; Abdelrahman AlAshqar; Jaden Kohn; Anastasia Tambovtseva; Karen C Wang; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2022-05-20

5.  Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Abeer Eddib; Alexandra Danakas; Shawna Hughes; Mehmet Erk; Caroline Michalik; Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan; Venkat Krovi; Pankaj Singhal
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2014-04-01

6.  Outcomes of obese versus non-obese subjects undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  W B Davenport; M P Lowe; D H Chamberlin; S A Kamelle; P R Johnson; M Tyndall; T D Tillmanns
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-01-19

7.  Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.

Authors:  Dan-Arin Silasi; Taryn Gallo; Michelle Silasi; Gulden Menderes; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Evelyn M Schepers; Erik W van Zwet; Andries R H Twijnstra; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcomes in obese and morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Taryn Gallo; Shabnam Kashani; Divya A Patel; Karim Elsahwi; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches.

Authors:  Mona Orady; Alexander Hrynewych; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.