Literature DB >> 21411220

Is there a difference in outcomes of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with the choice of cerebrospinal fluid diversion site: a single centre experience.

Andrew Tarnaris1, Ahmed K Toma, Laurence D Watkins, Neil D Kitchen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The visual and headache outcomes in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) undergoing cerebrospinal fluid diversion with a lumboperitoneal (LPS) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) have not been well reported. The aims of this study were to: (a) to assess outcomes of CSF diversion in IIH, (b) to understand influence of the type of shunt in outcomes, and (c) to understand factors predisposing in shunt failure.
METHODS: The medical records of 34 patients who underwent cerebrospinal fluid diversion (CSFD) between 1996 and 2007 were retrieved and epidemiological and clinical data was collected.
RESULTS: The mean age was 35 (±7.9) years. Thirty-four patients underwent 63 shunt placements in total. 85% follow-up was achieved. The mean follow-up for the entire group was 28.9 (±31.8) months. Headaches improved more than visual disturbances. There was no significant difference between the groups that received a VPS and those receiving an LPS in both headache and visual outcomes. The rate of complications was 20.5% and the need for revision was 35% for the whole group. Patients with LPS suffered more complications and first time revisions than patients with VPS. No factor recorded could predict the need for revision or final outcomes. The shunts of patients receiving a VPS tend to survive longer than those receiving primarily an LPS, however the difference is not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Predicting which patients will improve is not possible at present. The influence of site diversion is not critical but patients with VPS have less complications and revisions than those receiving a LPS.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21411220     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  19 in total

Review 1.  Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Valérie Biousse; Beau B Bruce; Nancy J Newman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Visual Outcomes from Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S J Hickman; N Raoof; H Panesar; J M McMullan; I M Pepper; B Sharrack
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2014-11-12

3.  Transverse sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: a cost comparison with CSF shunting.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; F Zmudzki; G D Parker; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Update on the surgical management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Nisha Mukherjee; M Tariq Bhatti
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  M Cristina Victorio; A David Rothner
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 7.  A systematic review of surgical treatments of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).

Authors:  Aristotelis Kalyvas; Eleftherios Neromyliotis; Christos Koutsarnakis; Spyridon Komaitis; Evangelos Drosos; Georgios P Skandalakis; Mantha Pantazi; Y Pierre Gobin; George Stranjalis; A Patsalides
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Neurosurgical CSF Diversion in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Geraint J Sunderland; Michael D Jenkinson; Elizabeth J Conroy; Carrol Gamble; Conor L Mallucci
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 9.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; research progress and emerging themes.

Authors:  Ruchika Batra; Alexandra Sinclair
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Evaluation of Admissions and Emergency Readmissions through the Hospital Episode Statistic Dataset between 2002-2020.

Authors:  Susan P Mollan; Jemma Mytton; Georgios Tsermoulas; Alex J Sinclair
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.