Literature DB >> 21411218

The impact of medical emergency teams on ICU admission rates, cardiopulmonary arrests and mortality in a regional hospital.

Natasha Laurens1, Trudy Dwyer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In-hospital cardiac arrests are commonly associated with poor outcomes and preceded by observable signs of clinical deterioration. Medical emergency teams (METs) have emerged to provide early specialist care intervention to critically ill patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of MET implementation on hospital-wide mortality rates, cardiopulmonary arrests and admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a regional Queensland hospital.
METHOD: A prospective cohort before and after interventional trial was conducted on adult and paediatric inpatients admitted in 2004-2008 at a 150 bed regional teaching hospital in Australia. MET was introduced in 2006 and attended clinically unstable patients. Response was activated by the bedside nurse or doctor according to predefined criteria.
RESULTS: There were a total of 296 MET activations. After MET implementation, mean hospital-wide mortality rates decreased from 9.9 to 7.5 per 1000 admissions (relative risk reduction, RRR: 24.2%; p = 0.003). Similarly, ICU admissions decreased from 22.4 to 17.6 per 1000 admissions (RRR: 21.4%; p < 0.0001). There was also a significant decline in hospital-wide cardiopulmonary arrests post intervention (77 versus 42, RRR: 45.5%; p = 0.0025) however this may be explained by the increase in the number of patients deemed not for resuscitation by the MET. Secondary analysis revealed evidence of MET underuse that may have affected the mortality findings.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of the MET in a regional hospital was associated with statistically significant reductions in hospital-wide mortality rates, ICU admissions and cardiopulmonary arrests.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21411218     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  7 in total

Review 1.  Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.

Authors:  Jennifer McGaughey; Dean A Fergusson; Peter Van Bogaert; Louise Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 2.  Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradford D Winters; Sallie J Weaver; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Ting Yang; Julius Cuong Pham; Sydney M Dy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A randomized trial of real-time automated clinical deterioration alerts sent to a rapid response team.

Authors:  Marin H Kollef; Yixin Chen; Kevin Heard; Gina N LaRossa; Chenyang Lu; Nathan R Martin; Nelda Martin; Scott T Micek; Thomas Bailey
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 4.  Rapid response systems: are they really effective?

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Sonia D'Arrigo; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Nurses' worry or concern and early recognition of deteriorating patients on general wards in acute care hospitals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gooske Douw; Lisette Schoonhoven; Tineke Holwerda; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Arthur R H van Zanten; Theo van Achterberg; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Caring for critically ill patients outside intensive care units due to full units: a cohort study.

Authors:  Fabiane Urizzi; Marcos T Tanita; Josiane Festti; Lucienne T Q Cardoso; Tiemi Matsuo; Cintia M C Grion
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Imperfect implementation of an early warning scoring system in a Danish teaching hospital: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mark Niegsch; Maria Louise Fabritius; Jacob Anhøj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.