M Johansson1, D M Phuong, S M Walther, H Hanberger. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. magnus.johansson86@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Survey of antibiotic consumption, microbial resistance and hygiene precautions in the intensive care units of three hospitals in northern Vietnam. METHODS: Observational study. Data were collected from the microbiological laboratories. Antibiotic consumption was determined based on quantities of drugs delivered from the pharmacy. A protocol to observe the application of hygiene precautions was developed and used. Bacteria were typed and tested for drug susceptibility using the disc-diffusion method. RESULTS: The mean antibiotic consumption was 811 defined daily doses per 1000 occupied bed days. The most commonly used antibiotics were third-generation cephalosporins, followed by carbapenems, amoxicillin and ampicillin. Eighty per cent of bacterial isolates were Gram-negative. The most common pathogens found in blood cultures were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas spp. were the two most frequently isolated bacteria from the respiratory tract and all other sources together. Seventy per cent of Acinetobacter species showed reduced susceptibility to imipenem, 80% to ciprofloxacin and 89% to ceftazidime. Forty-four per cent of Pseudomonas spp. showed reduced susceptibility to imipenem, 49% to ciprofloxacin and 49% to ceftazidime. Escherichia coli was fully susceptible to imipenem, but 57% of samples were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime. Hygiene precautions were poor, and fewer than 50% of patient contacts incorporated appropriate hand hygiene. CONCLUSION: Low antibiotic consumption, poor hygiene precautions and the high level of antibiotic resistance indicate that there is room for improvement regarding antibiotic use and infection control.
OBJECTIVE: Survey of antibiotic consumption, microbial resistance and hygiene precautions in the intensive care units of three hospitals in northern Vietnam. METHODS: Observational study. Data were collected from the microbiological laboratories. Antibiotic consumption was determined based on quantities of drugs delivered from the pharmacy. A protocol to observe the application of hygiene precautions was developed and used. Bacteria were typed and tested for drug susceptibility using the disc-diffusion method. RESULTS: The mean antibiotic consumption was 811 defined daily doses per 1000 occupied bed days. The most commonly used antibiotics were third-generation cephalosporins, followed by carbapenems, amoxicillin and ampicillin. Eighty per cent of bacterial isolates were Gram-negative. The most common pathogens found in blood cultures were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas spp. were the two most frequently isolated bacteria from the respiratory tract and all other sources together. Seventy per cent of Acinetobacter species showed reduced susceptibility to imipenem, 80% to ciprofloxacin and 89% to ceftazidime. Forty-four per cent of Pseudomonas spp. showed reduced susceptibility to imipenem, 49% to ciprofloxacin and 49% to ceftazidime. Escherichia coli was fully susceptible to imipenem, but 57% of samples were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime. Hygiene precautions were poor, and fewer than 50% of patient contacts incorporated appropriate hand hygiene. CONCLUSION: Low antibiotic consumption, poor hygiene precautions and the high level of antibiotic resistance indicate that there is room for improvement regarding antibiotic use and infection control.
Authors: N Stoesser; K Emary; S Soklin; K Peng An; S Sophal; S Chhomrath; N P J Day; D Limmathurotsakul; P Nget; Y Pangnarith; S Sona; V Kumar; C E Moore; N Chanpheaktra; C M Parry Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Heiman F L Wertheim; Arjun Chandna; Phu Dinh Vu; Ca Van Pham; Phong Dai Thi Nguyen; Yen Minh Lam; Chau Vinh Van Nguyen; Mattias Larsson; Ulf Rydell; Lennart E Nilsson; Jeremy Farrar; Kinh Van Nguyen; Håkan Hanberger Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Kinh Van Nguyen; Nga Thuy Thi Do; Arjun Chandna; Trung Vu Nguyen; Ca Van Pham; Phuong Mai Doan; An Quoc Nguyen; Chuc Kim Thi Nguyen; Mattias Larsson; Socorro Escalante; Babatunde Olowokure; Ramanan Laxminarayan; Hellen Gelband; Peter Horby; Ha Bich Thi Ngo; Mai Thanh Hoang; Jeremy Farrar; Tran Tinh Hien; Heiman F L Wertheim Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Vu Dinh Phu; Heiman F L Wertheim; Mattias Larsson; Behzad Nadjm; Quynh-Dao Dinh; Lennart E Nilsson; Ulf Rydell; Tuyet Thi Diem Le; Son Hong Trinh; Hung Minh Pham; Cang Thanh Tran; Hanh Thi Hong Doan; Nguyen Thua Tran; Nhan Duc Le; Nhuan Van Huynh; Thao Phuong Tran; Bao Duc Tran; Son Truong Nguyen; Thao Thi Ngoc Pham; Tam Quang Dang; Chau Van Vinh Nguyen; Yen Minh Lam; Guy Thwaites; Kinh Van Nguyen; Hakan Hanberger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ngo Ngoc Quang Minh; Pham Van Toi; Le Minh Qui; Le Binh Bao Tinh; Nguyen Thi Ngoc; Le Thi Ngoc Kim; Nguyen Hanh Uyen; Vu Thi Ty Hang; Nguyen Thi Thuy Chinh B'Krong; Nguyen Thi Tham; Thai Dang Khoa; Huynh Duy Khuong; Pham Quynh Vi; Nguyen Ngoc Hong Phuc; Le Thi Minh Vien; Thomas Pouplin; Doan Van Khanh; Pham Nguyen Phuong; Phung Khanh Lam; Heiman F L Wertheim; James I Campbell; Stephen Baker; Christopher M Parry; Juliet E Bryant; Constance Schultsz; Nguyen Thanh Hung; Menno D de Jong; H Rogier van Doorn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240