Literature DB >> 21410303

Underutilization of statins in patients with type 2 diabetes in US clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study.

Alex Z Fu1, Qiaoyi Zhang, Michael J Davies, Sri-Ram Pentakota, Larry Radican, Thomas Seck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who were eligible for statin treatment per American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations and the proportion who were actually prescribed a statin in US clinical practice. Factors associated with receiving a statin prescription were also determined.
METHODS: Patients ≥ 25 years diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or had received prescriptions for antihyperglycemic agents between 7/2006 and 6/2008 were identified within a large electronic medical record database. Eligibility for statin therapy was determined according to 2008 ADA recommendations. Statin use was assessed based on prescription records during a 12-month follow-up period. An adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the likelihood of statin use in relation to selected baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 125,464 patients identified, 98.5% were eligible for statin therapy. Only 62.9% received a statin prescription during follow-up period. In an adjusted logistic regression, factors associated with increased likelihood of statin use were older age, male gender, smoking, history of cardiovascular conditions, and receiving an antihyperglycemic, antihypertensive, or anticoagulant prescription at baseline (all p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: Of the patients who did not receive statin during follow-up, 13% of them were previously on a statin during the baseline period. The reasons for discontinuing therapy are not known. It cannot be excluded that some of these patients were intolerant or had contraindications to statin. The data on prescription dispensing and compliance were not recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all patients with type 2 diabetes were eligible for statin therapy, but less than two-thirds received statin therapy in US clinical practice. Efforts to minimize this gap are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21410303     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.567257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quality of medical care for persons with serious mental illness: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Emma E McGinty; Julia Baller; Susan T Azrin; Denise Juliano-Bult; Gail L Daumit
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Diabetes and gastric cancer: the potential links.

Authors:  Chin-Hsiao Tseng; Farn-Hsuan Tseng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Pre-existing diabetes mellitus increases the risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Moon Yoon; Ki Young Son; Chun Sick Eom; Daniel Durrance; Sang Min Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Potentially inappropriate prescribing for adults living with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mohammed Biset Ayalew; M Joy Spark; Frances Quirk; Gudrun Dieberg
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Gender disparities in diabetes and coronary heart disease medication among patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the DIANA study.

Authors:  Heike U Krämer; Elke Raum; Gernot Rüter; Ben Schöttker; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Thomas Rosemann; Joachim Szecsenyi; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.951

6.  Does the use of an electronic reminder device with or without counseling improve adherence to lipid-lowering treatment? The results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Kooy; B L G van Wijk; E R Heerdink; A de Boer; M L Bouvy
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.