Literature DB >> 21410091

Development of an advanced nomogram for myopic astigmatic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Jesse B Biebesheimer1, Terry S Kang, Cynthia Y Huang, Fei Yu, D Rex Hamilton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship between preoperative parameters and postoperative overcorrection or undercorrection in eyes with myopic astigmatism treated with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and to develop an advanced surgical nomogram. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 468 eyes that underwent wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia with astigmatism with the Alcon LADARVision 4000 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), of which 235 had flaps created by microkeratome (OneUse; Moria Surgical, Doylestown, PA) and 233 by femtosecond laser (Intralase; AMO, Santa Ana, CA). Manifest sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent were recorded preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Various parameters from patient records were analyzed to identify which had greatest influence on outcomes.
RESULTS: Manifest spherical equivalent was the most important predictor of surgical overcorrection, with the second being spherical aberration. In both groups, there was a statistically significant (P < .0001) correlation of spherical aberration with the amount of overcorrection. Using these two parameters, compensatory nomograms were derived.
CONCLUSION: Surgical overcorrection in wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism correlates positively with the amount of spherical equivalent treated and preoperative spherical aberration. Nomograms incorporating spherical aberration may improve accuracy of outcomes. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21410091     DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20110303-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging        ISSN: 1542-8877


  5 in total

1.  [LASIK nomogram modifications for the treatment of myopic astigmatism].

Authors:  B Zuberbühler; D Gartry; A Roudsari
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave ® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Brent S Betts; Daniel S Churgin; Maylon Hsu; Marcus Neuffer; Shameema Sikder; Dane Church; Mark D Mifflin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-20

3.  Comparison of Corneal Wavefront-optimized and Wavefront-guided Alcohol-assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Schwind Amaris 750S Laser for Myopia.

Authors:  Min Ji Kang; Jehyung Hwang; So Hyang Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06

4.  Artificial intelligence-based nomogram for small-incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Seungbin Park; Hannah Kim; Laehyun Kim; Jin-Kuk Kim; In Sik Lee; Ik Hee Ryu; Youngjun Kim
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Outcome comparison between wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaled M Hamam; Mohamed I Gbreel; Randa Elsheikh; Amira Y Benmelouka; Yassamine Ouerdane; Amr K Hassan; Aboalmagd Hamdallah; Ahmed B Elsnhory; Anas Z Nourelden; Ahmed T Masoud; Asmaa A Ali; Khaled M Ragab; Ahmed M Ibrahim
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.