Literature DB >> 21409754

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: current status and future perspectives.

K Corten1, R Ganz, J P Simon, M Leunig.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a concept of hip replacement that allows treating young active patients with a femoral bone preserving procedure. The proposed advantages of resuming an active lifestyle with increased frequency and duration of sports activities have been shown to be realistic. The 30-year cost-effectiveness in young male patients has been shown to be higher in resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement (THA). However, prognosticators of an inferior outcome have also been identified. The most important patient related factors are secondary osteoarthritis as the indication for surgery such as post-childhood hip disorders or AVN, female gender, smaller component sizes and older age (>65 years for males and >55 years for females). In addition, surgical technique (approach and cementing technique) and component design are also important determinant factors for the risk of failure. Moreover, concerns have surfaced with respect to high metal ion concentrations and metal ion hypersensitivities. In addition, the presumed ease of revising HRA has not reflected in improved or equal survivorship in comparison to a primary THA. This highlights the importance of identifying patient-, surgery-, and implant-related prognosticators for success or failure of HRA. Rather than vilifying the concept of hip resurfacing, detailed in depth analysis should be used to specify indications and improve implant design and surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21409754     DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v021a19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  7 in total

Review 1.  Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So.

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Antoine Combes; Charles Berton; Donatien Bocquet; Laurent Vasseur; Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-11

2.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients.

Authors:  Marius Dettmer; Amir Pourmoghaddam; Stefan W Kreuzer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 3.  The Sequelae of Metallosis Resulting in Skin Pigmentation and Tattooing: A Case Presentation and Literature Review.

Authors:  Stephen Thomas; Conor Gouk; Narlaka Jayasakeera; Michael Freeman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-12-14

4.  Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Dani Gaillard-Campbell; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-11-01

5.  Patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty are not physically more active than those with a stemmed total hip.

Authors:  Jetse Jelsma; Martijn G M Schotanus; Ivo T A F Buil; Sander M J van Kuijk; Ide C Heyligers; Bernd Grimm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases.

Authors:  Melissa D Gaillard; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A new strategy to reconstruct type III acetabular bone defect associated with inflammatory pseudotumor: combined medial and lateral acetabular bone grafting: A case report.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Dejiu Wang; Jiang Du; Zhen Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.