| Literature DB >> 21408195 |
Bernice B Rumala1, Jack Hidary, Linda Ewool, Christopher Emdin, Ted Scovell.
Abstract
In an effort to increase science exposure for pre-college (K-12) students and as part of the science education reform agenda, many biomedical research institutions have established university-community partnerships. Typically, these science outreach programs consist of pre-structured, generic exposure for students, with little community engagement. However, the use of a medium that is accessible to both teachers and scientists, electronic web-based matchmaking (E-matching) provides an opportunity for tailored outreach utilizing a community-based participatory approach (CBPA), which involves all stakeholders in the planning and implementation of the science outreach based on the interests of teachers/students and scientists. E-matching is a timely and urgent endeavor that provides a rapid connection for science engagement between teachers/students and experts in an effort to fill the science outreach gap. National Lab Network (formerly National Lab Day), an ongoing initiative to increase science equity and literacy, provides a model for engaging the public in science via an E-matching and hands-on learning approach. We argue that science outreach should be a dynamic endeavor that changes according to the needs of a target school. We will describe a case study of a tailored science outreach activity in which a public school that serves mostly under-represented minority students from disadvantaged backgrounds were E-matched with a university, and subsequently became equal partners in the development of the science outreach plan. In addition, we will show how global science outreach endeavors may utilize a CBPA, like E-matching, to support a pipeline to science among under-represented minority students and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. By merging the CBPA concept with a practical case example, we hope to inform science outreach practices via the lens of a tailored E-matching approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21408195 PMCID: PMC3050634 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Biol ISSN: 1544-9173 Impact factor: 8.029
Traditional approach versus CBPA through science outreach E-matching.
| Traditional | CBPA |
| University | Outreach is tailored and formulated in collaboration with representatives of the K–12 school to ensure that the needs of the student population are met. The university and the K–12 school are equal partners in the development of the science outreach plan.The K–12 school approaches the university with a science outreach need, or the university can approach the K–12 school with a science outreach proposal that can be tailored to the K–12 school's needs. |
| Impacts of science outreach are shared with members of the university. | Impacts of science outreach are shared with both members of the university and representatives of the K–12 school as part of collaborative partnership. |
| Sometimes relationship with the K–12 school ends after the outreach, especially if it is of short duration. | Relationship with the K–12 school continues. |
| Debriefing often occurs with members of the university. | Debriefing often occurs with the K–12 school and university as part of the collaborative endeavor. |
| Evaluation is done by the university on the K–12 school and shared with members of the institution. | Evaluation is done by the university in collaboration with the K–12 school. The results are shared with both the K–12 school and members of the university. |
| Less time is required to set up the program. | More time is required to set up program as a result of tailored approach. |
Note: For the purposes of this paper, university is used as the collaborating organization. However, the collaborating organization can extend beyond the university.
Figure 1National Lab Network E-matching diagram.
Figure 2Ads from National Lab Network site.
Science outreach needs and tailored agenda for National Lab Day.
| School Needs | National Lab Day Agenda | Participants |
| Need for exposure to racially and ethnically diverse scientists | Mentoring advice; diverse science training and careers panel consisting of racial/ethnic and gender diverse scientists/scientists in training | PhD, MD/PhD, and MD students |
| Exposure to diverse career options in the sciences | Mentoring advice, science training and careers panel, mentoring and mingling session, campus/lab tours, interactive science demonstration, and science research presentation | Science outreach staff, research scientists, and various members of the health professional and research team |
| Seeing “real-life science” at work | Science research presentation, interactive science demonstration, lab tours | Science outreach staff; health professional and research team; PhD, MD/PhD, and MD students |