BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Field trials of lambda-cyhalothrin 10 CS (ICON 10 CS) in indoor residual spraying (IRS) with 25 mg a.i./m2 against Anopheles culicifacies was undertaken vs malathion IRS (25% WP-2 g a.i./m2) in Tumkur district, Karnataka; vs deltamethrin IRS (2.5% WP-20 mg a.i./m2) in Dharmapuri district; and vs lambda-cyhalothrin (10 WP-25 mg a.i./m2) in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. METHODS: Spray operations in the experimental villages were done by the National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR) and in the control villages by the respective State Health Department staff. Persistence of efficacy of insecticide sprayed in villages was assessed by contact bioassays against vector mosquitoes. Entomological indicators such as per structure density, parity rates of vector mosquitoes and sporozoite rates were measured in all the three study areas using standard procedures. Mass blood surveys and active fever case detections were carried out in experimental and control villages to study the impact of IRS on malaria transmission. RESULTS: Persistence of effectiveness of ICON 10 CS was observed up to 2-3 months in all the three study areas. ICON 10 CS was found effective at par with or better than the insecticides used in the national programme in reducing the mosquito densities and in interrupting malaria transmission in the study villages. Vector density, parity rates and malaria cases considerably reduced in the ICON 10 CS-sprayed villages. CONCLUSION: Field trials at three sites have established that ICON 10 CS formulation was relatively more effective than malathion 25% WP, deltamethrin 2.5% WP and lambda-cyhalothrin 10% WP in some evaluation parameters like indoor resting mosquitoes, parity rates in vector mosquitoes and persistence of effectiveness. It can be used for IRS for malaria vector control with two rounds of spray at an interval of 3 months for curtailing the malaria transmission and an additional round is recommended in perennial malaria transmission areas.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Field trials of lambda-cyhalothrin 10 CS (ICON 10 CS) in indoor residual spraying (IRS) with 25 mg a.i./m2 against Anopheles culicifacies was undertaken vs malathion IRS (25% WP-2 g a.i./m2) in Tumkur district, Karnataka; vs deltamethrin IRS (2.5% WP-20 mg a.i./m2) in Dharmapuri district; and vs lambda-cyhalothrin (10 WP-25 mg a.i./m2) in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. METHODS: Spray operations in the experimental villages were done by the National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR) and in the control villages by the respective State Health Department staff. Persistence of efficacy of insecticide sprayed in villages was assessed by contact bioassays against vector mosquitoes. Entomological indicators such as per structure density, parity rates of vector mosquitoes and sporozoite rates were measured in all the three study areas using standard procedures. Mass blood surveys and active fever case detections were carried out in experimental and control villages to study the impact of IRS on malaria transmission. RESULTS: Persistence of effectiveness of ICON 10 CS was observed up to 2-3 months in all the three study areas. ICON 10 CS was found effective at par with or better than the insecticides used in the national programme in reducing the mosquito densities and in interrupting malaria transmission in the study villages. Vector density, parity rates and malaria cases considerably reduced in the ICON 10 CS-sprayed villages. CONCLUSION: Field trials at three sites have established that ICON 10 CS formulation was relatively more effective than malathion 25% WP, deltamethrin 2.5% WP and lambda-cyhalothrin 10% WP in some evaluation parameters like indoor resting mosquitoes, parity rates in vector mosquitoes and persistence of effectiveness. It can be used for IRS for malaria vector control with two rounds of spray at an interval of 3 months for curtailing the malaria transmission and an additional round is recommended in perennial malaria transmission areas.
Authors: Josiane Etang; Philippe Nwane; Jean Arthur Mbida; Michael Piameu; Blaise Manga; Daniel Souop; Parfait Awono-Ambene Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Simon Blanford; Nina E Jenkins; Riann Christian; Brian H K Chan; Luisa Nardini; Michael Osae; Lizette Koekemoer; Maureen Coetzee; Andrew F Read; Matthew B Thomas Journal: Malar J Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Jovin Kitau; Richard Oxborough; Johnson Matowo; Franklin Mosha; Stephen M Magesa; Mark Rowland Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: James C Dunford; Alden S Estep; Christy M Waits; Alec G Richardson; David F Hoel; Karin Horn; Todd W Walker; Jessika S Blersch; Jerry D Kerce; Robert A Wirtz Journal: Malar J Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: A Rohani; H Ahmad Fakhriy; I Suzilah; M N Zurainee; W M A Wan Najdah; M Mohd Ariffin; N Mohamad Shakirudin; M S Mohd Afiq; J Jenarun; Y Tanrang; H L Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240