Literature DB >> 21406647

Prevalence of heavy smoking in California and the United States, 1965-2007.

John P Pierce1, Karen Messer, Martha M White, David W Cowling, David P Thomas.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The intensity of smoking, not just prevalence, is associated with future health consequences.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate smoking intensity patterns over time and by age within birth cohorts for California and the remaining United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two large population-based surveys with state estimates: National Health Interview Surveys, 1965-1994; and Current Population Survey Tobacco Supplements, 1992-2007. There were 139,176 total respondents for California and 1,662,353 for the remaining United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD), high-intensity smokers (≥20 CPD); moderate-intensity smokers (10-19 CPD); low-intensity smokers (0-9 CPD).
RESULTS: In 1965, 23.2% of adults in California (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.6%-26.8%) and 22.9% of adults in the remaining United States (95% CI, 22.1%-23.6%) were high-intensity smokers, representing 56% of all smokers. By 2007, this prevalence was 2.6% (95% CI, 0.0%-5.6%) or 23% of smokers in California and 7.2% (95% CI, 6.4%-8.0%) or 40% of smokers in the remaining United States. Among individuals (US residents excluding California) born between 1920-1929, the prevalence of moderate/high-intensity smoking (≥10 CPD) was 40.5% (95% CI, 38.3%-42.7%) in 1965. Moderate/high-intensity smoking declined across successive birth cohorts, and for the 1970-1979 birth cohort, the highest rate of moderate/high-intensity smoking was 9.7% (95% CI, 7.7%-11.7%) in California and 18.3% (95% CI, 16.4%-20.2%) in the remaining United States. There was a marked decline in moderate/high-intensity smoking at older ages in all cohorts, but this was greater in California. By age 35 years, the prevalence of moderate/high-intensity smoking in the 1970-1979 birth cohort was 4.6% (95% CI, 3.0%-6.1%) in California and 13.5% (95% CI, 11.8%-15.1%) in the remaining United States.
CONCLUSIONS: Between 1965 and 2007, the prevalence of high-intensity smoking decreased greatly in the United States. The greater decline in high-intensity smoking prevalence in California was related to reduced smoking initiation and a probable increase in smoking cessation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21406647     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  45 in total

Review 1.  An update about tobacco and cancer: what clinicians should know.

Authors:  Steven A Schroeder
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  The role of HPV in head and neck cancer and review of the HPV vaccine.

Authors:  Gypsyamber D'Souza; Amanda Dempsey
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  Xenobiotic particle exposure and microvascular endpoints: a call to arms.

Authors:  Phoebe A Stapleton; Valerie C Minarchick; Michael McCawley; Travis L Knuckles; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Lifetime cigarette smoking and breast cancer prognosis in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project.

Authors:  John P Pierce; Ruth E Patterson; Carolyn M Senger; Shirley W Flatt; Bette J Caan; Loki Natarajan; Sarah J Nechuta; Elizabeth M Poole; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wendy Y Chen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Digital detection for tobacco control: online reactions to the 2009 U.S. cigarette excise tax increase.

Authors:  John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Kurt M Ribisl; Sherry Emery
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Predictors of quit attempts and successful quit attempts in a nationally representative sample of smokers.

Authors:  Claudia Rafful; Olaya García-Rodríguez; Shuai Wang; Roberto Secades-Villa; Jose M Martínez-Ortega; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Left behind? Drug discovery in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan W Riess; Primo N Lara
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Tobacco use disparities by racial/ethnic groups: California compared to the United States.

Authors:  Kari-Lyn K Sakuma; Jamie Quibol Felicitas-Perkins; Lyzette Blanco; Pebbles Fagan; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Kim Pulvers; Devan Romero; Dennis R Trinidad
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Smoking trajectories among Koreans in Seoul and California: exemplifying a common error in age parameterization.

Authors:  Jon-Patrick Allem; John W Ayers; Jennifer B Unger; Veronica L Irvin; C Richard Hofstetter; Melbourne F Hovell
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

10.  Longitudinal smoking patterns in survivors of childhood cancer: An update from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Todd M Gibson; Wei Liu; Gregory T Armstrong; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Robert C Klesges; Kevin C Oeffinger; Paul C Nathan; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.