BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of a metastatic site may differ from that of the primary site. This difference may influence patient prognosis and response to therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization to compare human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor status in primary and metastatic breast cancers. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in this study. Conversion from hormone receptor positive in the primary tumor to hormone receptor negative in the metastasis occurred in 12 patients (21.4%), and hormone receptor negative to hormone receptor positive conversion occurred in two patients (3.6%). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was discordant between primary and metastatic lesions in seven patients (12.5%). All of the five patients who converted from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative status to human epidermal growth factor receptor positive received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival for concordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients were 69.2% and 16.9 months, whereas that of patients with positive conversion of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 were 40.0% and 7.6 months, respectively (overall response rate; P = 0.169 and progression-free survival; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Discordance in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor status between primary and metastatic tumors was observed, which led to altered treatment decisions. Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor in metastatic tumors should be considered in patients with breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of a metastatic site may differ from that of the primary site. This difference may influence patient prognosis and response to therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization to compare humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor status in primary and metastatic breast cancers. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in this study. Conversion from hormone receptor positive in the primary tumor to hormone receptor negative in the metastasis occurred in 12 patients (21.4%), and hormone receptor negative to hormone receptor positive conversion occurred in two patients (3.6%). Humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was discordant between primary and metastatic lesions in seven patients (12.5%). All of the five patients who converted from humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative status to humanepidermal growth factor receptor positive received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival for concordant humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients were 69.2% and 16.9 months, whereas that of patients with positive conversion of humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 were 40.0% and 7.6 months, respectively (overall response rate; P = 0.169 and progression-free survival; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Discordance in humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor status between primary and metastatic tumors was observed, which led to altered treatment decisions. Evaluation of humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor in metastatic tumors should be considered in patients with breast cancer.
Authors: Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Gary A Ulaner; David M Hyman; Dara S Ross; Adriana Corben; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Shari Goldfarb; Heather McArthur; Joseph P Erinjeri; Stephen B Solomon; Hartmuth Kolb; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Jorge A Carrasquillo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher D Hart; Ilenia Migliaccio; Luca Malorni; Cristina Guarducci; Laura Biganzoli; Angelo Di Leo Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Naoki Niikura; Bruno C Odisio; Yutaka Tokuda; Fraser W Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Gary A Ulaner; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Christopher C Riedl; Randy Yeh; Vaios Hatzoglou; Dara S Ross; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; David M Hyman; Brian M Zeglis; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gary A Ulaner; Chris C Riedl; Maura N Dickler; Komal Jhaveri; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Wolfgang Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 10.057