PURPOSE: To compare the effects of topical cyclosporine A 0.05% (Restasis) with those of prednisolone acetate 1.00% (Pred Forte) on corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine-Orange, California, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: After -9.00 diopter PRK, 15 rabbits were divided into 3 groups and treated for 4 weeks with prednisolone acetate 1.00% or cyclosporine A 0.05% or neither (control). Corneal haze was measured by in vivo confocal microscopy preoperatively and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks, the corneas were evaluated for collagen organization by ex vivo 2-photon second-harmonic generation and stromal cell density. RESULTS: Corneal haze was significantly less in the prednisolone acetate group than in the cyclosporine and control groups during the first 6 weeks postoperatively (P<.02). At 8 weeks, there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in haze between the cyclosporine and control groups at any time. The stroma was also significantly thinner in the prednisolone acetate group than in the other groups for the first 4 weeks postoperatively (P<.02). Second-harmonic generation scar thickness measurements at 12 weeks were not significantly different between the groups, although the prednisolone acetate group tended to have lower stromal cell density. CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine A 0.05% had no effect on wound healing after PRK, while prednisolone acetate 1.00% significantly reduced peak corneal haze but had no effect on long-term corneal haze after discontinuation of the drug.
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of topical cyclosporine A 0.05% (Restasis) with those of prednisolone acetate 1.00% (Pred Forte) on corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine-Orange, California, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: After -9.00 diopter PRK, 15 rabbits were divided into 3 groups and treated for 4 weeks with prednisolone acetate 1.00% or cyclosporine A 0.05% or neither (control). Corneal haze was measured by in vivo confocal microscopy preoperatively and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks, the corneas were evaluated for collagen organization by ex vivo 2-photon second-harmonic generation and stromal cell density. RESULTS: Corneal haze was significantly less in the prednisolone acetate group than in the cyclosporine and control groups during the first 6 weeks postoperatively (P<.02). At 8 weeks, there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in haze between the cyclosporine and control groups at any time. The stroma was also significantly thinner in the prednisolone acetate group than in the other groups for the first 4 weeks postoperatively (P<.02). Second-harmonic generation scar thickness measurements at 12 weeks were not significantly different between the groups, although the prednisolone acetate group tended to have lower stromal cell density. CONCLUSION:Cyclosporine A 0.05% had no effect on wound healing after PRK, while prednisolone acetate 1.00% significantly reduced peak corneal haze but had no effect on long-term corneal haze after discontinuation of the drug.
Authors: D P O'Brart; C P Lohmann; G Klonos; M C Corbett; W S Pollock; M G Kerr-Muir; J Marshall Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Marjan Farid; Anshu Agrawal; Daniel Fremgen; Jeremiah Tao; He Chuyi; Anthony B Nesburn; Lbachir BenMohamed Journal: Ocul Immunol Inflamm Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.070
Authors: Andrew J Quantock; Moritz Winkler; Geraint J Parfitt; Robert D Young; Donald J Brown; Craig Boote; James V Jester Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Ashish Tandon; Ajay Sharma; Jason T Rodier; Alexander M Klibanov; Frank G Rieger; Rajiv R Mohan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kaitlin T Wozniak; Sam C Butler; Xu He; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 3.770
Authors: Mark D Mifflin; Brent S Betts; P Adam Frederick; Jason M Feuerman; Carlton R Fenzl; Majid Moshirfar; Brian Zaugg Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-12
Authors: Soohyun Kim; Young Woo Park; Euiri Lee; Sang Wan Park; Sungwon Park; Hyunwoo Noh; Jong Whi Kim; Je Kyung Seong; Kangmoon Seo Journal: J Vet Med Sci Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 1.267