Literature DB >> 21406277

Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.: a diabetes belt.

Lawrence E Barker1, Karen A Kirtland, Edward W Gregg, Linda S Geiss, Theodore J Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American "stroke belt" has contributed to the study of stroke. However, U.S. geographic patterns of diabetes have not been as specifically characterized.
PURPOSE: This study identifies a geographically coherent region of the U.S. where the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes is especially high, called the "diabetes belt."
METHODS: In 2010, data from the 2007 and 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were combined with county-level diagnosed diabetes prevalence estimates. Counties in close proximity with an estimated prevalence of diagnosed diabetes ≥11.0% were considered to define the diabetes belt. Prevalence of risk factors in the diabetes belt was compared to that in the rest of the U.S. The fraction of the excess risk associated with living in the diabetes belt associated with selected risk factors, both modifiable (sedentary lifestyle, obesity) and nonmodifiable (age, gender, race/ethnicity, education), was calculated.
RESULTS: A diabetes belt consisting of 644 counties in 15 mostly southern states was identified. People in the diabetes belt were more likely to be non-Hispanic African-American, lead a sedentary lifestyle, and be obese than in the rest of the U.S. Thirty percent of the excess risk was associated with modifiable risk factors, and 37% with nonmodifiable factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of the difference in diabetes prevalence between the diabetes belt and the rest of the U.S. is associated with sedentary lifestyle and obesity. Culturally appropriate interventions aimed at decreasing obesity and sedentary lifestyle in counties within the diabetes belt should be considered. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21406277     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  110 in total

1.  Bayesian Small Area Estimates of Diabetes Incidence by United States County, 2009.

Authors:  Lawrence E Barker; Theodore J Thompson; Karen A Kirtland; James P Boyle; Linda S Geiss; Mary M McCauley; Ann L Albright
Journal:  J Data Sci       Date:  2013-04

2.  Estimating smoking-attributable mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew Fenelon; Samuel H Preston
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-08

3.  Determining Chronic Disease Prevalence in Local Populations Using Emergency Department Surveillance.

Authors:  David C Lee; Judith A Long; Stephen P Wall; Brendan G Carr; Samantha N Satchell; R Scott Braithwaite; Brian Elbel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Understanding and overcoming barriers to living kidney donation among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States.

Authors:  Tanjala S Purnell; Yoshio N Hall; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.620

5.  All rural places are not created equal: revisiting the rural mortality penalty in the United States.

Authors:  Wesley L James
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sociodemographic Patterns of Chronic Disease: How the Mid-South Region Compares to the Rest of the Country.

Authors:  Gabriela R Oates; Bradford E Jackson; Edward E Partridge; Karan P Singh; Mona N Fouad; Sejong Bae
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  The Time Is Now: Diabetes Fellowships in the United States.

Authors:  Archana R Sadhu; Amber M Healy; Shivajirao P Patil; Doyle M Cummings; Jay H Shubrook; Robert J Tanenberg
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Diabetes prevalence is associated with different community factors in the diabetes belt versus the rest of the United States.

Authors:  Candice A Myers; Tim Slack; Stephanie T Broyles; Steven B Heymsfield; Timothy S Church; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Using Indirect Measures to Identify Geographic Hot Spots of Poor Glycemic Control: Cross-sectional Comparisons With an A1C Registry.

Authors:  David C Lee; Qun Jiang; Bahman P Tabaei; Brian Elbel; Christian A Koziatek; Kevin J Konty; Winfred Y Wu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Geographic information systems and chronic kidney disease: racial disparities, rural residence and forecasting.

Authors:  Rudolph A Rodriguez; John R Hotchkiss; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.