| Literature DB >> 21406070 |
Alireza Moeen Rezakhanlou1, Darya Habibi1,2, Amy Lai1, Reza B Jalili1,3, Christopher J Ong2, Aziz Ghahary1,4.
Abstract
Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) is a potent immunomodulatory enzyme that has recently attracted significant attention for its potential application as an inducer of immunotolerance in transplantation. We have previously demonstrated that a collagen matrix populated with IDO-expressing fibroblasts can be applied successfully in suppressing islet allogeneic immune response. Meanwhile, a critical aspect of such immunological intervention relies largely on effective long-term expression of the IDO gene. Moreover, gene manipulation of primary cells is known to be challenging due to unsatisfactory expression of the exogenous gene. In this study, a lentiviral gene delivery system has been employed to transduce primary fibroblasts. We used polybrene to efficiently deliver the IDO gene into primary fibroblasts and showed a significant increase (about tenfold) in the rate of gene transfection. In addition, by the use of fluorescence-activated cell sorting, a 95% pure population of IDO-expressing fibroblasts was successfully obtained. The efficiency of the IDO expression and the activity of the enzyme have been confirmed by Western blotting, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and Kynurenine assay, respectively. The findings of this study revealed simple and effective strategies through which an efficient and stable expression of IDO can be achieved for primary cells which, in turn, significantly improves its potential as a tool for achieving immunotolerance in different types of transplantation.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21406070 PMCID: PMC3055793 DOI: 10.1007/s12575-010-9028-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
Figure 1Construction of a lentiviral-based vector for delivering the IDO gene. a Schematic diagram of the IDO–mCherry lentiviral construct. b Fluorescence microscopy analysis of IDO-expressing cells. Panels a and b as well as c and d represent bright-field and fluorescent images of the IDO–mCherry (red) expression in non-transduced and transduced 293T cells, respectively. c Lentiviral vector-mediated IDO protein expression in transduced 293T cells. The arrow on the upper band shows the IDO protein. The IDO-lentiviral vector lanes represent two separate viral preparations. The blot was reprobed with a β-actin antibody as a loading control. d Kynurenine assay. Functional IDO activity was evaluated by measuring the content of kynurenine in the conditioned media of non-transduced and IDO-lentiviral vector-transduced cells. The data shown are the mean and standard deviation of kynurenine in conditioned media of three separate experiments.
Figure 2Transduction of mouse fibroblasts with IDO-expressing lentiviral vector. a Fluorescence microscopy analysis of IDO-lentiviral vector-transduced fibroblasts. Cultured mouse fibroblasts were incubated with IDO-lentiviral vector either in the presence or absence of polybrene. Cells that were transduced in the presence of polybrene were then sorted by FACS. Panels a and e, b and f, c and g, as well as d and h represent bright-field and fluorescence images of non-transduced fibroblasts, IDO-lentiviral vector-transduced fibroblasts, fibroblasts transduced with IDO-expressing lentiviral vector in the presence of polybrene, and fibroblasts transduced with IDO-expressing lentiviral vector in the presence of polybrene after sorting, respectively. b These panels show the Western blot analysis (a) as well as kynurenine levels (b) in different indicated cells. The data shown are the mean and standard deviation of kynurenine measurements obtained from three different experiments. c Flow cytometry analysis of the IDO-expressing cell population. Fibroblasts were left either non-transduced or transduced with IDO-expressing lentiviral vector in the absence or presence of polybrene and flow cytometry was then conducted by gating the cells based on their mCherry fluorescence. The selected cell population was prepared by cell sorting and the number of mCherry-positive cells was greater than 95%. Panel a shows non-transduced fibroblasts, b transduced IDO-expressing fibroblasts in the absence of polybrene, c transduced IDO-expressing fibroblasts in the presence of polybrene, and d FACS-sorted IDO-expressing fibroblasts (in the presence of polybrene). Panel e shows the percentage of mCherry-positive fluorescent cells in the total cell population studied as detected by flow cytometry. The data shown are the mean and standard deviation of mCherry-positive cells obtained from three separate experiments.