Literature DB >> 21404847

Impacts of the use of nonnative commercial bumble bees for pollinator supplementation in raspberry.

G C Lye1, S N Jennings, J L Osborne, D Goulson.   

Abstract

Evidence for pollinator declines has led to concern that inadequate pollination services may limit crop yields. The global trade in commercial bumble bee (Bombus spp.) colonies provides pollination services for both glasshouse and open-field crops. For example, in the United Kingdom, commercial colonies of nonnative subspecies of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris L. imported from mainland Europe are widely used for the pollination of raspberries, Rubus idaeus L. The extent to which these commercial colonies supplement the services provided by wild pollinators has not been formally quantified and the impact of commercial bumble bees on native bees visiting the crop is unknown. Here, the impacts of allowing commercially available bumble bee colonies to forage on raspberry canes are assessed in terms of the yield of marketable fruit produced and the pollinator communities found foraging on raspberry flowers. No differences were found in the abundance, diversity, or composition of social bee species observed visiting raspberry flowers when commercial bumble bees were deployed compared with when they were absent. However, weight of marketable raspberries produced increased when commercial bees were present, indicating that wild pollinator services alone are inadequate for attaining maximum yields. The findings of the study suggests that proportional yield increases associated with deployment of commercial colonies may be small, but that nevertheless, investment in commercial colonies for raspberry pollination could produce very significant increases in net profit for the grower. Given potential environmental risks associated with the importation of nonnative bumble bees, the development of alternative solutions to the pollination deficit in raspberry crops in the United Kingdom may be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404847     DOI: 10.1603/ec10092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  8 in total

1.  Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex.

Authors:  James C Carolan; Tomás E Murray; Úna Fitzpatrick; John Crossley; Hans Schmidt; Björn Cederberg; Luke McNally; Robert J Paxton; Paul H Williams; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid increases expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  William R Simmons; David R Angelini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Varietal and seasonal differences in the effects of commercial bumblebees on fruit quality in strawberry crops.

Authors:  Callum D Martin; Michelle T Fountain; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Agric Ecosyst Environ       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 5.567

4.  Experimental evidence that wildflower strips increase pollinator visits to crops.

Authors:  Hannah Feltham; Kirsty Park; Jeroen Minderman; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Pollination services provided by bees in pumpkin fields supplemented with either Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens or not supplemented.

Authors:  Jessica D Petersen; Stephen Reiners; Brian A Nault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services.

Authors:  Madeleine Chagnon; David Kreutzweiser; Edward A D Mitchell; Christy A Morrissey; Dominique A Noome; Jeroen P Van der Sluijs
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?

Authors:  Peter Graystock; Edward J Blane; Quinn S McFrederick; Dave Goulson; William O H Hughes
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Pathogen prevalence in commercially reared bumble bees and evidence of spillover in conspecific populations.

Authors:  Tomás E Murray; Mary F Coffey; Eamonn Kehoe; Finbarr G Horgan
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.990

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.