INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated the effect of knee position on quadriceps force steadiness and activation strategies. METHODS: Quadriceps force steadiness was evaluated in 22 volunteers at two knee positions by testing their ability to regulate submaximal force. Muscle activation strategies were studied in both time and frequency domains using surface electromyography. RESULTS: Quadriceps force fluctuations and the associated agonist and antagonist activity were significantly higher at 90° than at 30° of flexion (P < 0.05). The quadriceps median frequency recorded at 30° was significantly higher than at 90° of flexion (P < 0.05). Regression analyses revealed that force steadiness was related to quadriceps activation and median frequency (P < 0.001), but not to hamstring coactivation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that knee position significantly affects quadriceps force steadiness and activation strategies. This finding may have important implications for designing a force control testing protocol and interpreting test results.
INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated the effect of knee position on quadriceps force steadiness and activation strategies. METHODS: Quadriceps force steadiness was evaluated in 22 volunteers at two knee positions by testing their ability to regulate submaximal force. Muscle activation strategies were studied in both time and frequency domains using surface electromyography. RESULTS: Quadriceps force fluctuations and the associated agonist and antagonist activity were significantly higher at 90° than at 30° of flexion (P < 0.05). The quadriceps median frequency recorded at 30° was significantly higher than at 90° of flexion (P < 0.05). Regression analyses revealed that force steadiness was related to quadriceps activation and median frequency (P < 0.001), but not to hamstring coactivation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that knee position significantly affects quadriceps force steadiness and activation strategies. This finding may have important implications for designing a force control testing protocol and interpreting test results.
Authors: N A Segal; N A Glass; J Torner; M Yang; D T Felson; L Sharma; M Nevitt; C E Lewis Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Nguyen D Nguyen; Chatlert Pongchaiyakul; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-05-31 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Laura C Schmitt; Mark V Paterno; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kaiwi Chung-Hoon; Brian L Tracy; Leland E Dibble; Robin L Marcus; Paul Burgess; Paul C LaStayo Journal: J Geriatr Phys Ther Date: 2016 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.381