Literature DB >> 21404129

Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions.

Çağlar Akçay1, Eliot Hazeltine.   

Abstract

An influential account of how cognitive control deals with conflicting sources of information holds that conflict is monitored by a module that automatically recruits attention to resolve the conflict. This leads to reduced effects of conflict on the subsequent trial, a phenomenon termed conflict adaptation. A prominent question is whether control processes are domain specific--that is, recruited only by the particular type of conflict they resolve. Previous studies that have examined this question used two-choice tasks in which feature repetition effects could be responsible for domain-specific adaptation effects. We report two experiments using four-choice (Experiment 1) and five-choice (Experiment 2) tasks that contain two types of irrelevant sources of potentially conflicting information: stimulus location (Simon conflict) and distractors (flanker conflict). In both experiments, we found within-type conflict adaptation for both types of conflict after eliminating trials on which stimulus features were repeated from one trial to the next. Across-type conflict adaptation, however, was not significant. Thus, conflict adaptation was due to domain-specific recruitment of cognitive control. Our results add converging evidence to the idea that multiple independent control processes are involved in reactive cognitive control, although whether control is always local remains to be determined.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404129     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0084-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh; Paul Laurey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold; Eric Soetens; Hannes Schröter; Werner Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.

Authors:  John G Kerns; Jonathan D Cohen; Angus W MacDonald; Raymond Y Cho; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Rainer H Kluwe; Alexandra Peters
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Margaret Delano; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Wilfried Kunde; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

7.  Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations.

Authors:  Cağlar Akçay; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

8.  Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

10.  Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10
View more
  23 in total

1.  Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.

Authors:  Magali Kreutzfeldt; Denise N Stephan; Klaus Willmes; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 3.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Miriam Tomat; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Michael Sprengel; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 5.  Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

6.  Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.

Authors:  Antonio L Freitas; Sheri L Clark
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-02

7.  Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-28

8.  Is cognitive control automatic? New insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  G Cona; B Treccani; C A Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

9.  A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks.

Authors:  Nina S Hsu; Susanne M Jaeggi; Jared M Novick
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Out with the Old and in with the New: the Contribution of Prefrontal and Cerebellar Areas to Backward Inhibition.

Authors:  Silvia Picazio; Francesca Foti; Massimiliano Oliveri; Giacomo Koch; Laura Petrosini; Fabio Ferlazzo; Stefano Sdoia
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.