PURPOSE: The interindividual variability of vincristine pharmacokinetics is quite large, but the origins of this variability are not properly understood. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of vincristine in a paediatric population treated for solid tumour disease and evaluate the impact of different ABCB1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on the different pharmacokinetic parameters. METHODS: We assessed vincristine pharmacokinetics in 26 children treated for various solid tumour diseases. Genotypes were determined by real-time PCR with a LightCycler™ and ABCB1 haplotypes calculated using the software program Phase 2.1. Vincristine plasma concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS, and a population approach was performed on 184 samples by the NONMEM computer program. Demographic, therapeutic and genotypic covariables were evaluated on vincristine pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: The frequency of CYP3A4*1A/*1A and *1A/*1B genotypes were 87.5 and 12.5%, respectively. CYP3A5*1/*3 and *3/*3 were observed in 20.8 and 79.2% of the patients, respectively. The three major haplotypes were (allelic frequencies) CGC (50%), CGT (14.6%) and TTT (23.2%). Vincristine pharmacokinetics was well described by a two-compartment model. Large interindividual and interoccasion variability were observed. The different polymorphisms studied did not improve the model prediction. CONCLUSIONS: CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms did not significantly affect in vivo vincristine pharmacokinetics. Our results demonstrate that vincristine pharmacokinetic variability cannot be explained by these genetic polymorphisms.
PURPOSE: The interindividual variability of vincristine pharmacokinetics is quite large, but the origins of this variability are not properly understood. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of vincristine in a paediatric population treated for solid tumour disease and evaluate the impact of different ABCB1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on the different pharmacokinetic parameters. METHODS: We assessed vincristine pharmacokinetics in 26 children treated for various solid tumour diseases. Genotypes were determined by real-time PCR with a LightCycler™ and ABCB1 haplotypes calculated using the software program Phase 2.1. Vincristine plasma concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS, and a population approach was performed on 184 samples by the NONMEM computer program. Demographic, therapeutic and genotypic covariables were evaluated on vincristine pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: The frequency of CYP3A4*1A/*1A and *1A/*1B genotypes were 87.5 and 12.5%, respectively. CYP3A5*1/*3 and *3/*3 were observed in 20.8 and 79.2% of the patients, respectively. The three major haplotypes were (allelic frequencies) CGC (50%), CGT (14.6%) and TTT (23.2%). Vincristine pharmacokinetics was well described by a two-compartment model. Large interindividual and interoccasion variability were observed. The different polymorphisms studied did not improve the model prediction. CONCLUSIONS:CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms did not significantly affect in vivo vincristine pharmacokinetics. Our results demonstrate that vincristine pharmacokinetic variability cannot be explained by these genetic polymorphisms.
Authors: Johan G C van Hasselt; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jodi L Skiles; ChienWei Chiang; Claire H Li; Steve Martin; Ellen L Smith; Gilbert Olbara; David R Jones; Terry A Vik; Saskia Mostert; Floor Abbink; Gertjan J Kaspers; Lang Li; Festus Njuguna; Tammy J Sajdyk; Jamie L Renbarger Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Francesco Ceppi; Chloé Langlois-Pelletier; Vincent Gagné; Julie Rousseau; Claire Ciolino; Samanta De Lorenzo; Kojok M Kevin; Diana Cijov; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; Donna Neuberg; Jeffery L Kutok; Daniel Sinnett; Caroline Laverdière; Maja Krajinovic Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: William A May; Rita S Grigoryan; Nino Keshelava; Daniel J Cabral; Laura L Christensen; Jasmine Jenabi; Lingyun Ji; Timothy J Triche; Elizabeth R Lawlor; C Patrick Reynolds Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240