BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation have been associated with poor graft outcomes in multiple studies. However, these studies have generally used stored sera or a single cross sectional screening test to identify patients with DSA. We evaluated the effectiveness of a prospective DSA screening protocol in identifying kidney and kidney/pancreas recipients at risk for poor graft outcomes. METHODS: From September 2007 through September 2009, 244 consecutively transplanted kidney and kidney/pancreas recipients without pretransplant DSA were screened for de novo DSA at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months and when clinically indicated. RESULTS: DSA was detected in 27% of all patients by protocol or indication screening. Patients with DSA (DSA+) were significantly more likely to have experienced acute rejection (AR) compared with no DSA (DSA-) (29% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), and lower estimated 2-year graft survival (83% vs. 98%, P<0.001). Only 3 of 19 DSA (+) patients with AR had DSA detected before the AR episode. When excluding patients with AR, 2-year graft survival was similar between DSA (+) and DSA (-) patients (100% vs. 99%) as was estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with DSA detected by protocol screening had similar outcomes compared with DSA (-), whereas those with DSA detected by indication experienced significantly worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with de novo DSA experience worse graft outcomes due to previous/concurrent episodes of AR. A prospective DSA screening protocol failed to identify patients at risk for AR or poor short-term graft outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation have been associated with poor graft outcomes in multiple studies. However, these studies have generally used stored sera or a single cross sectional screening test to identify patients with DSA. We evaluated the effectiveness of a prospective DSA screening protocol in identifying kidney and kidney/pancreas recipients at risk for poor graft outcomes. METHODS: From September 2007 through September 2009, 244 consecutively transplanted kidney and kidney/pancreas recipients without pretransplant DSA were screened for de novo DSA at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months and when clinically indicated. RESULTS:DSA was detected in 27% of all patients by protocol or indication screening. Patients with DSA (DSA+) were significantly more likely to have experienced acute rejection (AR) compared with no DSA (DSA-) (29% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), and lower estimated 2-year graft survival (83% vs. 98%, P<0.001). Only 3 of 19 DSA (+) patients with AR had DSA detected before the AR episode. When excluding patients with AR, 2-year graft survival was similar between DSA (+) and DSA (-) patients (100% vs. 99%) as was estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with DSA detected by protocol screening had similar outcomes compared with DSA (-), whereas those with DSA detected by indication experienced significantly worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with de novo DSA experience worse graft outcomes due to previous/concurrent episodes of AR. A prospective DSA screening protocol failed to identify patients at risk for AR or poor short-term graft outcomes.
Authors: A I Dipchand; S Webber; K Mason; B Feingold; C Bentlejewski; W T Mahle; R Shaddy; C Canter; E D Blume; J Lamour; W Zuckerman; H Diop; Y Morrison; B Armstrong; D Ikle; J Odim; A Zeevi Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Jeffrey L Platt; Christina L Kaufman; Mayara Garcia de Mattos Barbosa; Marilia Cascalho Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Esme I Dijke; Jeffrey L Platt; Paul Blair; Menna R Clatworthy; Jignesh K Patel; A G Kfoury; Marilia Cascalho Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: H Kaneku; J G O'Leary; N Banuelos; L W Jennings; B M Susskind; G B Klintmalm; P I Terasaki Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 8.086