Literature DB >> 21403571

Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.

Eduardo Piza Pellizzer1, Rosse Mary Falcón-Antenucci, Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho, Daniela Mayumi Inatomi Kavano Sánchez, Gabriel Augusto Tozo Rinaldi, Carolina Calles de Aguirre, Marcelo Coelho Goiato.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a photoelastic analysis of stress distribution on straight and angulated implants with different crowns (screwed and cemented). Three models were made of photoelastic resin PL-2: model 1: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 0 degrees; model 2: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 17 degrees; model 3: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 30 degrees. Axial and oblique (45 degrees) load (100 N) was applied with a universal testing machine. The photoelastic fringes on the models were recorded with a digital camera and visualized in a graphic software for qualitative analysis. The axial loading generated the same pattern of stress distribution. The highest stresses were concentrated between medium and apical thirds. The oblique loading generated a similar pattern of stress distribution in the models with similar implant angulation; the highest stress was located on the cervical region opposite to implant angulation and on the apical third. It was concluded that the higher the implant angulation, the higher the stress value, independent of crown type. The screwed prostheses exhibited the highest stress concentration. The oblique load generated higher stress value and concentration than the axial load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21403571     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318207477c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of immediately loaded mandibular four vertical versus tilted posterior implants supporting fixed detachable restorations without versus with posterior cantilevers.

Authors:  Latifa Abdallah Mohamed; Mohamed Moataz Khamis; Ahlam Mostafa El-Sharkawy; Rania Abdelaziz Fahmy
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-08-29

Review 2.  Angulated implants: an alternative to bone augmentation and sinus lift procedure: systematic review.

Authors:  Nikhil Asawa; Nilesh Bulbule; Dilip Kakade; Riddhi Shah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

3.  Stress distribution pattern of screw-retained restorations with segmented vs. non-segmented abutments: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shima Aalaei; Zahra Rajabi Naraki; Fatemeh Nematollahi; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Afsaneh Shahrokhi Rad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2017-09-20

4.  Thickness of the buccal bone wall and root angulation in the maxilla and mandible: an approach to cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P López-Jarana; C M Díaz-Castro; A Falcão; C Falcão; J V Ríos-Santos; M Herrero-Climent
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Ho Yeol Jang; Su Young Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.