Literature DB >> 21403534

Craniometric and velopharyngeal assessment of infants with and without cleft palate.

Jamie L Perry1, David P Kuehn, Bradley P Sutton, Michael S Goldwasser, Alex D Jerez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study was designed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information of the velopharyngeal mechanism and craniometric dimensions in infants born with a normal mechanism and in infants with an unrepaired cleft palate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained from the medical charts of 4 infants (2 with cleft lip and palate and 2 without) between the ages of 8 and 9 months. Craniometric measures and levator veli palatini muscle morphology were analyzed using visualization modeling software. Both raw measures and measures normalized by head circumference were examined.
RESULTS: Patients 1 and 2 demonstrated normal velopharyngeal anatomy and a similar distance between levator muscle origins (38.9-40.7 mm), sagittal angles of origin (56-57 degrees), and levator muscle bundle lengths (28.4-30.7 mm). Patients with an unrepaired cleft palate displayed smaller oblique coronal angles of origins (58-62 degrees) compared with patients without cleft palate (62-67 degrees). Patients without cleft palate showed a steeper muscle (56-57 degrees) compared with patients without cleft palate (66-67 degrees). The basion-sella-nasion angle, hard palate length, and hard palate width measurements are related systematically to head circumference in this patient group. DISCUSSION: Results from the current study are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating variations across patients with cleft palate particularly in the muscle bundle lengths, distance between muscle origins, velar thickness, and velar length. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine how levator muscle and craniometric dimensions vary between those with and without cleft palate. A larger sample size is necessary to provide statistical analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21403534     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182087378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  A Computational Model Quantifies the Effect of Anatomical Variability on Velopharyngeal Function.

Authors:  Joshua M Inouye; Jamie L Perry; Kant Y Lin; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Morphology of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle in Adults With Repaired Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Jamie L Perry; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Asymmetry and Positioning of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Catherine M Pelland; Silvia S Blemker; Michael S Jaskolka; Xiangming Fang; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Method to Examine In Vivo Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Function During Speech.

Authors:  Catherine M Pelland; Xue Feng; Kathleen C Borowitz; Craig H Meyer; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Morphology of the levator veli palatini muscle using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; David P Kuehn; Bradley P Sutton
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-10-24

6.  Using MRI for assessing velopharyngeal structures and function.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; Bradley P Sutton; David P Kuehn; Jinadasa K Gamage
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-04-08

7.  Sexual dimorphism of the levator veli palatini muscle: an imaging study.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; David P Kuehn; Bradley P Sutton; Jinadasa K Gamage
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-06-19

8.  Wnt7a induces satellite cell expansion, myofiber hyperplasia and hypertrophy in rat craniofacial muscle.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Hanyao Huang; Xiangyou Luo; Bing Shi; Jingtao Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.