Ashish Thakur1, Rajendra Kadam, Uday B Kompella. 1. Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adverse effects such as elevated intraocular pressure and cataracts, which are lower with dexamethasone when compared with fluocinolone acetonide or triamcinolone acetonide, may be explained in part by the differences in drug lipophilicity and partitioning of these drugs into the trabecular meshwork and lens. METHODS: The n-octanol/phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) partition coefficient (log distribution coefficient [D]) and bovine/human ocular tissue partition coefficients were determined for triamcinolone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, fluocinolone acetonide, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide at 37°C. RESULTS: The log D of the corticosteroids ranged from 0.712 to 2.970. The ranges of tissue:PBS partition coefficients following drug incubation at 0.4, 2.0, and 10.0 μg/mL were 0.35 to 1.56, 0.30 to 2.12, and 0.30 to 1.95, respectively, for the bovine lens, 0.87 to 4.18, 0.71 to 4.40, and 0.69 to 5.86, respectively, for the human lens, and 2.98 to 9.48, 2.41 to 9.16, and 1.71 to 9.96, respectively, for the bovine trabecular meshwork. In general, tissue partitioning showed a positive correlation with log D. Dexamethasone, with lipophilicity less than triamcinolone acetonide and fluocinolone acetonide, exhibited the least amount of partitioning in the trabecular meshwork and lens among these 3 corticosteroids commonly used for treating diseases at the back of the eye. CONCLUSION: Binding of corticosteroids to the trabecular meshwork and lens increases as drug lipophilicity increases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Less lipophilic corticosteroids with limited partitioning to the trabecular meshwork and lens may result in reduced incidence of elevated intraocular pressure and cataracts.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adverse effects such as elevated intraocular pressure and cataracts, which are lower with dexamethasone when compared with fluocinolone acetonide or triamcinolone acetonide, may be explained in part by the differences in drug lipophilicity and partitioning of these drugs into the trabecular meshwork and lens. METHODS: The n-octanol/phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) partition coefficient (log distribution coefficient [D]) and bovine/human ocular tissue partition coefficients were determined for triamcinolone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, fluocinolone acetonide, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide at 37°C. RESULTS: The log D of the corticosteroids ranged from 0.712 to 2.970. The ranges of tissue:PBS partition coefficients following drug incubation at 0.4, 2.0, and 10.0 μg/mL were 0.35 to 1.56, 0.30 to 2.12, and 0.30 to 1.95, respectively, for the bovine lens, 0.87 to 4.18, 0.71 to 4.40, and 0.69 to 5.86, respectively, for the human lens, and 2.98 to 9.48, 2.41 to 9.16, and 1.71 to 9.96, respectively, for the bovine trabecular meshwork. In general, tissue partitioning showed a positive correlation with log D. Dexamethasone, with lipophilicity less than triamcinolone acetonide and fluocinolone acetonide, exhibited the least amount of partitioning in the trabecular meshwork and lens among these 3 corticosteroids commonly used for treating diseases at the back of the eye. CONCLUSION: Binding of corticosteroids to the trabecular meshwork and lens increases as drug lipophilicity increases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Less lipophilic corticosteroids with limited partitioning to the trabecular meshwork and lens may result in reduced incidence of elevated intraocular pressure and cataracts.
Authors: Mark C Gillies; Judy M Simpson; Wei Luo; Philip Penfold; Alex B L Hunyor; William Chua; Paul Mitchell; Frank Billson Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2003-05
Authors: Osman Cekiç; Stanley Chang; Joseph J Tseng; Yusuf Akar; Gaetano R Barile; William M Schiff Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel Martin; David Callanan; P Andrew Pearson; Brian Levy; Timothy Comstock Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Manuel B Datiles; Rafat R Ansari; Kwang I Suh; Susan Vitale; George F Reed; J Samuel Zigler; Frederick L Ferris Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2008-12
Authors: Eric K Chin; David R P Almeida; Gabriel Velez; Kunyong Xu; Maria Peraire; Maria Corbella; Yasser M Elshatory; Young H Kwon; Karen M Gehrs; H Culver Boldt; Elliott H Sohn; Stephen R Russell; James C Folk; Vinit B Mahajan Journal: Retina Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: J Chhablani; P Bansal; D Veritti; S Sambhana; V Sarao; F Pichi; P Carrai; D Massaro; A Lembo; A M Mansour; A Banker; S R Gupta; R Hamam; P Lanzetta Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Sherif A Gaballa; Uday B Kompella; Omar Elgarhy; Ali M Alqahtani; Barbara Pierscionek; Raid G Alany; Hamdy Abdelkader Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 4.617