Literature DB >> 21402091

Social interaction and sex differences influence rat temperature circadian rhythm under LD cycles and constant light.

T Cambras1, L Castejón, A Díez-Noguera.   

Abstract

Circadian rhythms produce an efficient organization of animal behaviour over the 24h day. In some species, social cues have been found to have a role as synchronizers of these rhythms. Here, the influence of social interaction on rat circadian behaviour was investigated, addressing the question of whether cohabitation would produce a delay in the appearance of arrhythmicity under constant light conditions. To this end, the circadian rhythms of male and female rat body temperature were studied for 10days under light-dark conditions, followed by 33days under constant bright light. Half of the animals were maintained in individual cages, whilst the others were maintained in larger cages in groups of three rats of the same sex. Results showed that individual circadian rhythms under 24hour light-dark (LD) cycles were more stable and with higher amplitude in grouped than in isolated animals, and higher in males than in females. During the first days under constant light (LL), the stability of the rhythm was also higher in males than in females, but there were no differences according to the group. Moreover, we did not find significant differences in the time of circadian rhythm loss under LL, since high individual variability was found for this variable. On the other hand, female rats living in isolation showed a delayed acrophase in the circadian rhythm under LD conditions compared with those living in groups. These results suggest that cohabitation increases the internal coherence of circadian behaviour, and could be interpreted as indicating that living in isolation may induce a level of stress that disturbs manifestation of the circadian rhythm, especially in females, which are also more reactive than males to external signals.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21402091     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in daily timekeeping and circadian clock circuits.

Authors:  Deborah A M Joye; Jennifer A Evans
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 7.499

2.  Diurnal Control of Blood Pressure Is Uncoupled From Sodium Excretion.

Authors:  Jermaine G Johnston; Joshua S Speed; Bryan K Becker; Malgorzata Kasztan; Reham H Soliman; Megan K Rhoads; Binli Tao; Chunhua Jin; Aron M Geurts; Kelly A Hyndman; Jennifer S Pollock; David M Pollock
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Circadian disruption leads to loss of homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Carolina Escobar; Roberto Salgado-Delgado; Eduardo Gonzalez-Guerra; Araceli Tapia Osorio; Manuel Angeles-Castellanos; Ruud M Buijs
Journal:  Sleep Disord       Date:  2012-01-24

4.  Methods for serial analysis of long time series in the study of biological rhythms.

Authors:  Antoni Díez-Noguera
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2013-07-18

5.  Effects of chronic forced circadian desynchronization on body weight and metabolism in male mice.

Authors:  Leandro P Casiraghi; Ana Alzamendi; Andrés Giovambattista; Juan J Chiesa; Diego A Golombek
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-04-27

Review 6.  Differential Effects of Constant Light and Dim Light at Night on the Circadian Control of Metabolism and Behavior.

Authors:  Valentina S Rumanova; Monika Okuliarova; Michal Zeman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.