Mikko Salaspuro1. 1. Research Unit on Acetaldehyde and Cancer, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. mikko.salaspuro@helsinki.fi
Abstract
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene polymorphisms associating with enhanced acetaldehyde exposure and markedly increased cancer risk in alcohol drinkers provide undisputable evidence for acetaldehyde being a local carcinogen not only in esophageal but also in gastric cancer. Accordingly, acetaldehyde associated with alcoholic beverages has recently been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen to humans. Microbes are responsible for the bulk of acetaldehyde production from ethanol both in saliva and Helicobacter pylori-infected and achlorhydric stomach. Acetaldehyde is the most abundant carcinogen in tobacco smoke and it readily dissolves into saliva during smoking. Many foodstuffs and 'non-alcoholic' beverages are important but unrecognized sources of local acetaldehyde exposure. The cumulative cancer risk associated with increasing acetaldehyde exposure suggests the need for worldwide screening of the acetaldehyde levels of alcoholic beverages and as well of the ethanol and acetaldehyde of food produced by fermentation. The generally regarded as safe status of acetaldehyde should be re-evaluated. The as low as reasonably achievable principle should be applied to the acetaldehyde of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages and food. Risk groups with ADH-and ALDH2 gene polymorphisms, H. pylori infection or achlorhydric atrophic gastritis, or both, should be screened and educated in this health issue. L-cysteine formulations binding carcinogenic acetaldehyde locally in the stomach provide new means for intervention studies.
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene polymorphisms associating with enhanced acetaldehyde exposure and markedly increased cancer risk in alcohol drinkers provide undisputable evidence for acetaldehyde being a local carcinogen not only in esophageal but also in gastric cancer. Accordingly, acetaldehyde associated with alcoholic beverages has recently been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen to humans. Microbes are responsible for the bulk of acetaldehyde production from ethanol both in saliva and Helicobacter pylori-infected and achlorhydric stomach. Acetaldehyde is the most abundant carcinogen in tobacco smoke and it readily dissolves into saliva during smoking. Many foodstuffs and 'non-alcoholic' beverages are important but unrecognized sources of local acetaldehyde exposure. The cumulative cancer risk associated with increasing acetaldehyde exposure suggests the need for worldwide screening of the acetaldehyde levels of alcoholic beverages and as well of the ethanol and acetaldehyde of food produced by fermentation. The generally regarded as safe status of acetaldehyde should be re-evaluated. The as low as reasonably achievable principle should be applied to the acetaldehyde of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages and food. Risk groups with ADH-and ALDH2 gene polymorphisms, H. pyloriinfection or achlorhydric atrophic gastritis, or both, should be screened and educated in this health issue. L-cysteine formulations binding carcinogenicacetaldehyde locally in the stomach provide new means for intervention studies.
Authors: Valerie Zabala; Ming Tong; Rosa Yu; Teresa Ramirez; Emine B Yalcin; Silvia Balbo; Elizabeth Silbermann; Chetram Deochand; Kavin Nunez; Stephen Hecht; Suzanne M de la Monte Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Mikko T Nieminen; Lily Novak-Frazer; Rebecca Collins; Sonja P Dawsey; Sanford M Dawsey; Christian C Abnet; Russell E White; Neal D Freedman; Michael Mwachiro; Paul Bowyer; Mikko Salaspuro; Riina Rautemaa Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lars Agréus; Ernst J Kuipers; Limas Kupcinskas; Peter Malfertheiner; Francesco Di Mario; Marcis Leja; Varocha Mahachai; Niv Yaron; Martijn van Oijen; Guillermo Perez Perez; Massimo Rugge; Jukka Ronkainen; Mikko Salaspuro; Pentti Sipponen; Kentaro Sugano; Joseph Sung Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.423