Literature DB >> 21401627

The worldwide frozen embryo reservoir: methodologies to achieve optimal results.

Antonio Capalbo1, Laura Rienzi, Matteo Buccheri, Roberta Maggiulli, Fabio Sapienza, Stefania Romano, Silvia Colamaria, Benedetta Iussig, Maddalena Giuliani, Antonio Palagiano, Filippo Ubaldi.   

Abstract

Cryopreservation of the human embryo has been successfully achieved at the zygote (day 1), cleavage (day 2/3), and blastocyst (day 5) stages; however, each stage presents specific advantages and disadvantages. During the past decades, two major methods have been applied: slow freezing (equilibrium procedure) and vitrification (nonequilibrium procedure). The overwhelming majority of published data prove that the latest vitrification methods induce less cellular trauma and are a more effective cryopreservation technique of human embryos than any other versions of slow freezing. For this reason, fragmented and slow-cleaving embryos that normally would not be recommended may be revaluated for cryopreservation by using the vitrification method. Furthermore, if laser-assisted necrotic blastomere removal is associated with the slow-freezing/thawing procedure, good clinical results can be obtained. Finally, the most proper embryo cleavage stage at which to perform cryopreservation has to be assessed according to clinical indications and laboratory experience.
© 2011 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21401627     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05931.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  5 in total

1.  Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhu; Ya-Mei Xue; Ling-Yun Yang; Ling-Ying Jiang; Chao Ling; Xiao-Mei Tong; Song-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Vitrification of blastocysts derived from fair to poor quality cleavage stage embryos can produce high pregnancy rates after warming.

Authors:  Chloë Shaw-Jackson; Evelyne Bertrand; Bénédicte Becker; Jérôme Colin; Caroline Beaudoin-Chabot; Serge Rozenberg; Candice Autin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Maryam Eftekhar; Elham Rahmani; Soheila Pourmasumi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-07

4.  Eighteen-year cryopreservation does not negatively affect the pluripotency of human embryos: evidence from embryonic stem cell derivation.

Authors:  Kamthorn Pruksananonda; Ruttachuk Rungsiwiwut; Pranee Numchaisrika; Vichuda Ahnonkitpanit; Nipan Isarasena; Pramuan Virutamasen
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2012-08

5.  A monocentric analysis of the efficacy of extracellular cryoprotectants in unfrozen solutions for cleavage stage embryos.

Authors:  Francesco Capodanno; Jessica Daolio; Gaetano De Feo; Angela Falbo; Daria Morini; Alessia Nicoli; Luca Braglia; MariaTeresa Villani; Giovanni B La Sala; Lodovico Parmegiani; Lorenzo Aguzzoli
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.