| Literature DB >> 21401627 |
Antonio Capalbo1, Laura Rienzi, Matteo Buccheri, Roberta Maggiulli, Fabio Sapienza, Stefania Romano, Silvia Colamaria, Benedetta Iussig, Maddalena Giuliani, Antonio Palagiano, Filippo Ubaldi.
Abstract
Cryopreservation of the human embryo has been successfully achieved at the zygote (day 1), cleavage (day 2/3), and blastocyst (day 5) stages; however, each stage presents specific advantages and disadvantages. During the past decades, two major methods have been applied: slow freezing (equilibrium procedure) and vitrification (nonequilibrium procedure). The overwhelming majority of published data prove that the latest vitrification methods induce less cellular trauma and are a more effective cryopreservation technique of human embryos than any other versions of slow freezing. For this reason, fragmented and slow-cleaving embryos that normally would not be recommended may be revaluated for cryopreservation by using the vitrification method. Furthermore, if laser-assisted necrotic blastomere removal is associated with the slow-freezing/thawing procedure, good clinical results can be obtained. Finally, the most proper embryo cleavage stage at which to perform cryopreservation has to be assessed according to clinical indications and laboratory experience.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21401627 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05931.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci ISSN: 0077-8923 Impact factor: 5.691