Literature DB >> 21401592

Negotiating a noisy, information-rich environment in search of cryptic prey: olfactory predators need patchiness in prey cues.

Alexandra J R Carthey1, Jenna P Bytheway, Peter B Banks.   

Abstract

1. Olfactory predator search processes differ fundamentally to those based on vision, particularly when odour cues are deposited rather than airborne or emanating from a point source. When searching for visually cryptic prey that may have moved some distance from a deposited odour cue, cue context and spatial variability are the most likely sources of information about prey location available to an olfactory predator. 2. We tested whether the house mouse (Mus domesticus), a model olfactory predator, would use cue context and spatial variability when searching for buried food items; specifically, we tested the effect of varying cue patchiness, odour strength, and cue-prey association on mouse foraging success. 3. Within mouse- and predator-proof enclosures, we created grids of 100 sand-filled Petri dishes and buried peanut pieces in a set number of these patches to represent visually cryptic 'prey'. By adding peanut oil to selected dishes, we varied the spatial distribution of prey odour relative to the distribution of prey patches in each grid, to reflect different levels of cue patchiness (Experiment 1), odour strength (Experiment 2) and cue-prey association (Experiment 3). We measured the overnight foraging success of individual mice (percentage of searched patches containing prey), as well as their foraging activity (percentage of patches searched), and prey survival (percentage of unsearched prey patches). 4. Mouse foraging success was highest where odour cues were patchy rather than uniform (Experiment 1), and where cues were tightly associated with prey location, rather than randomly or uniformly distributed (Experiment 3). However, when cues at prey patches were ten times stronger than a uniformly distributed weak background odour, mice did not improve their foraging success over that experienced when cues were of uniform strength and distribution (Experiment 2). 5. These results suggest that spatial variability and cue context are important means by which olfactory predators can use deposited odour cues to locate visually cryptic prey. They also indicate that chemical crypsis can disrupt these search processes as effectively as background matching in visually based predator-prey systems.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21401592     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01817.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  9 in total

1.  Roles of the volatile terpene, 1,8-cineole, in plant-herbivore interactions: a foraging odor cue as well as a toxin?

Authors:  Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez; Ido Isler; Peter B Banks; Clare McArthur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.

Authors:  Clare McArthur; Peter B Banks; Rudy Boonstra; Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The Emergence of a Stable Neuronal Ensemble from a Wider Pool of Activated Neurons in the Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Appetitive Learning in Mice.

Authors:  Leonie S Brebner; Joseph J Ziminski; Gabriella Margetts-Smith; Meike C Sieburg; Hayley M Reeve; Thomas Nowotny; Johannes Hirrlinger; Tristan G Heintz; Leon Lagnado; Shigeki Kato; Kazuto Kobayashi; Leslie A Ramsey; Catherine N Hall; Hans S Crombag; Eisuke Koya
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Increased olfactory search costs change foraging behaviour in an alien mustelid: a precursor to prey switching?

Authors:  Catherine J Price; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Food quality and conspicuousness shape improvements in olfactory discrimination by mice.

Authors:  Catherine J Price; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Odour-mediated Interactions Between an Apex Reptilian Predator and its Mammalian Prey.

Authors:  Christopher R Dickman; Loren L Fardell; Nicole Hills
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.793

7.  Innate positive chemotaxis to pollen from crops and banker plants in predaceous biological control agents: towards new field lures?

Authors:  Shu Li; Xiaoling Tan; Nicolas Desneux; Giovanni Benelli; Jing Zhao; Xinhai Li; Fan Zhang; Xiwu Gao; Su Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Influence of olfactory and visual cover on nest site selection and nest success for grassland-nesting birds.

Authors:  Dillon T Fogarty; R Dwayne Elmore; Samuel D Fuhlendorf; Scott R Loss
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Misinformation tactics protect rare birds from problem predators.

Authors:  Grant L Norbury; Catherine J Price; M Cecilia Latham; Samantha J Brown; A David M Latham; Gretchen E Brownstein; Hayley C Ricardo; Nikki J McArthur; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.