Literature DB >> 21401325

Using mode of action information to improve regulatory decision-making: an ECETOC/ILSI RF/HESI workshop overview.

Neil Carmichael1, Melanie Bausen, Alan R Boobis, Samuel M Cohen, Michelle Embry, Claudia Fruijtier-Pölloth, Helmut Greim, Richard Lewis, M E Bette Meek, Howard Mellor, Carolyn Vickers, John Doe.   

Abstract

The European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Research Foundation (RF), and the ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) hosted a workshop in November 2009 to review current practice in the application of mode of action (MOA) considerations in chemical risk assessment. The aim was to provide a rationale for a more general, but flexible approach and to propose steps to facilitate broader uptake and use of the MOA concept. There was consensus amongst the workshop participants that it will require substantial effort and cooperation from the multiple disciplines involved to embrace a common, consistent, and transparent approach. Setting up a repository of accepted MOAs and associated guidance concerning appropriate data to support specific MOAs for critical effects would facilitate categorization of chemicals and allow predictions of toxicity outcomes by read-across. This should in future contribute to the reduction of toxicity testing in animals. The workshop participants also acknowledged the value and importance of human data and the importance of integrating information from biological pathway analyses into current MOA/human relevance frameworks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21401325     DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2010.541225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  7 in total

Review 1.  The dangers of hazards.

Authors:  Colin Berry
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  A Systematic Review of Carcinogenic Outcomes and Potential Mechanisms from Exposure to 2,4-D and MCPA in the Environment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-26

Review 3.  Developing and applying the adverse outcome pathway concept for understanding and predicting neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Anna Bal-Price; Pamela J Lein; Kimberly P Keil; Sunjay Sethi; Timothy Shafer; Marta Barenys; Ellen Fritsche; Magdalini Sachana; M E Bette Meek
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Chemical carcinogenesis - mode of action to inform quantitative human risk.

Authors:  João Lauro V de Camargo
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2013-04-04

Review 5.  Advancing human health risk assessment: integrating recent advisory committee recommendations.

Authors:  Michael Dourson; Richard A Becker; Lynne T Haber; Lynn H Pottenger; Tiffany Bredfeldt; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 6.  Mode of action human relevance (species concordance) framework: Evolution of the Bradford Hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence.

Authors:  M E Bette Meek; Christine M Palermo; Ammie N Bachman; Colin M North; R Jeffrey Lewis
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 7.  New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis.

Authors:  M E Meek; A Boobis; I Cote; V Dellarco; G Fotakis; S Munn; J Seed; C Vickers
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.