Literature DB >> 21400232

First experience of autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

François Lefrère1, Anne-Colette Brignier, Caroline Elie, Jean-Antoine Ribeil, Michael Bernimoulin, Charbel Aoun, Liliane Dal Cortivo, Richard Delarue, Olivier Hermine, Marina Cavazzana-Calvo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mobilization techniques for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection include chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic growth factors, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Biosimilar versions of G-CSF are now available in Europe.
METHODS: In this study, 40 patients with a hematological malignancy scheduled to receive biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio(®) Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Paris, France) following first-cycle chemotherapy for treatment and autologous PBSC mobilization were prospectively included at a single center. These patients were compared with a historical control group who had been treated with G-CSF (Neupogen(®) Paris, France) at the same center according to the same clinical protocol. PBSC harvesting was considered successful if at least 3×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected. If three consecutive CD34+ tests were below 10/μL then PBSC harvesting was not performed.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups with no significant differences in age, diagnosis, previous chemotherapy, or chemotherapy mobilization regimen. No significant differences were observed between groups in median CD34+ cells mobilized and collected, or the number of G-CSF injections and leukaphereses required to obtain the minimal CD34+ cell count. Proportion of failures was also similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Zarziois(®) comparable to Neupogen(®) for PBSC mobilization and collection after chemotherapy and so may provide a more cost-effective strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21400232     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-011-0009-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  10 in total

1.  Use of biosimilar filgrastim compared with lenograstim in autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplant and in sibling allogeneic transplant.

Authors:  Shab Uddin; Pippa Russell; Maresa Farrell; Barbara Davy; Joe Taylor; Samir G Agrawal
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: what have we learned?

Authors:  Pere Gascón; Hans Tesch; Karl Verpoort; Maria Sofia Rosati; Nello Salesi; Samir Agrawal; Nils Wilking; Helen Barker; Michael Muenzberg; Matthew Turner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Biosimilar G-CSF based mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Schmitt; Amy Publicover; Kim H Orchard; Matthias Görlach; Lei Wang; Anita Schmitt; Jiju Mani; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Reeba Kuriakose; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Evaluation of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim XM02) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation: a single center experience in Japan.

Authors:  Hideaki Yoshimura; Masaaki Hotta; Takahisa Nakanishi; Shinya Fujita; Aya Nakaya; Atsushi Satake; Tomoki Ito; Kazuyoshi Ishii; Shosaku Nomura
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2017-01-24

Review 5.  Extrapolation in Practice: Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim.

Authors:  Pere Gascon; Andriy Krendyukov; Nicola Mathieson; Maja Natek; Matti Aapro
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.807

6.  Follow-on biologics in oncology - the need for global and local regulations.

Authors:  Iwona Hus
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-01-04

7.  Filgrastim XM02 (Tevagrastim®) after autologous stem cell transplantation compared to lenograstim: favourable cost-efficacy analysis.

Authors:  A Gardellini; F Gigli; A Babic; G Andreola; D Radice; S Sammassimo; G Martinelli; D Laszlo
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-06-25

Review 8.  Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: need we be afraid?

Authors:  Halvard Bonig; Petra S Becker; Arnd Schwebig; Matthew Turner
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Extrapolation concept at work with biosimilar: a decade of experience in oncology.

Authors:  Andriy Krendyukov; Martin Schiestl
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-02-06

10.  Efficacy and Safety of Nivestim Versus Neupogen for Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Cindy Chew; Hong Yen Ng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.