Literature DB >> 21399487

Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide.

Erkan Topkan1, Savaş Topuk, Ezgi Oymak, Cem Parlak, Berrin Pehlivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate pathologically confirmed incidence of pseudoprogression and its impact on survival in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), followed by 6 months of TMZ maintenance therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients with histologic proof of GBM underwent 60 Gy (2 Gy/fr, 30 fractions) of brain radiotherapy concurrent with continuous 75 mg/m/d TMZ, followed by 6 cycles of maintenance TMZ (200 mg/m/d for 5 d, every 28 d). Response assessment was performed by magnetic resonance imaging every 2 months. All patients with radiologic doubt of early tumor progression (≤6 mo) underwent salvage surgery.
RESULTS: All patients underwent surgical resection. Gross total, subtotal resection, and biopsy were performed in 17 (27.0%), 32 (51.6%), and 14 (21.4%) patients, respectively. Lesion enlargement on first follow-up magnetic resonance imaging evidenced in 28 (44.4%) patients. Salvage pathologies revealed pseudoprogression in 12 of 28 (42.8%) patients corresponding to an overall pseudoprogression rate of 19%. Survival analysis revealed that patients with pseudoprogression had superior overall and progression-free survival rates at both 1 and 2 years (P<0.05 for each, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Current results indicates the urgency of need for novel imaging techniques and/or biochemical marker(s) that can better distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful surgical interventions in almost half of the radiologically progressive GBM patients. Our additional observation which suggests better survival for patients with pseudoprogression warrants to be studied in larger patient cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21399487     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318210f54a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  29 in total

1.  Semi-automatic segmentation software for quantitative clinical brain glioblastoma evaluation.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Geoffrey S Young; Zhong Xue; Raymond Y Huang; Hui You; Kian Setayesh; Hiroto Hatabu; Fei Cao; Stephen T Wong
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Imaging spectrum of immunomodulating, chemotherapeutic and radiation therapy-related intracranial effects.

Authors:  Christie M Lincoln; Peter Fata; Susan Sotardi; Michael Pohlen; Tomas Uribe; Jacqueline A Bello
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Variability and accuracy of different software packages for dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing glioblastoma progression from pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Zachary S Kelm; Panagiotis D Korfiatis; Ravi K Lingineni; John R Daniels; Jan C Buckner; Daniel H Lachance; Ian F Parney; Rickey E Carter; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 4.  How to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yiming Ma; Qiwei Wang; Qian Dong; Lei Zhan; Jingdong Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Histopathological correlates with survival in reoperated glioblastomas.

Authors:  Graeme F Woodworth; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Xiaobu Ye; Jaishri O Blakeley; Jon D Weingart; Peter C Burger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Differentiating Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression in Patients with Glioblastomas Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI.

Authors:  S Wang; M Martinez-Lage; Y Sakai; S Chawla; S G Kim; M Alonso-Basanta; R A Lustig; S Brem; S Mohan; R L Wolf; A Desai; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Visual inspection of MR relative cerebral blood volume maps has limited value for distinguishing progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Authors:  Melissa Kerkhof; Pauline L Tans; Rogier E Hagenbeek; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Finn K Holla; Tjeerd J Postma; Chiara S Straathof; Linda Dirven; Martin Jb Taphoorn; Maaike J Vos
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2017-10-06

8.  Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutant glioblastomas demonstrate a decreased rate of pseudoprogression: a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Homan Mohammadi; Kevin Shiue; G Daniel Grass; Vivek Verma; Kay Engellandt; Dirk Daubner; Gabriele Schackert; Mercia J Gondim; Dibson Gondim; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Aaron P Kamer; William Jin; Timothy J Robinson; Gordon Watson; Hsiang-Hsuan M Yu; Tim Lautenschlaeger
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2019-10-10

9.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk; Sameer Parpia; Anthony Whitton; Jeffrey Noah Greenspoon
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2016-11-04

10.  Pseudoprogression in children, adolescents and young adults with non-brainstem high grade glioma and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Authors:  Fernando Carceller; Lucy A Fowkes; Komel Khabra; Lucas Moreno; Frank Saran; Anna Burford; Alan Mackay; David T W Jones; Volker Hovestadt; Lynley V Marshall; Sucheta Vaidya; Henry Mandeville; Neil Jerome; Leslie R Bridges; Ross Laxton; Safa Al-Sarraj; Stefan M Pfister; Martin O Leach; Andrew D J Pearson; Chris Jones; Dow-Mu Koh; Stergios Zacharoulis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.