Literature DB >> 2139940

[Prospective, randomized, controlled study of imipenem-cilastatin versus cefotaxime-amikacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection and septicemia at intensive care units].

Y Mouton1, Y Deboscker, C Bazin, F Fourrier, S Moulront, A Philippon, C Socolovsky, J L Suinat, A Tondriaux.   

Abstract

In a multicentre, prospective, controlled trial 211 patients with suspected septicaemia or pneumonia were allocated at random to either imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg 8-hourly or cefotaxime 1 g 6-hourly combined with amikacin 5 mg/kg 8-hourly. The treatments were administered for at least 5 days. Seventy patients on imipenem and 70 patients on cefotaxime-amikacin were assessable for comparison. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in underlying pathology and in the clinical results obtained: septicaemia 20/26 patients of the imipenem group and 20/25 patients of the cefotaxime-amikacin group were cured; pneumonia 38/44 patients of the imipenem group and 34/45 patients of the cefotaxime-amikacin group were cured. There were also no differences in the initial organisms and in the bacteriological cure rate, except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At the moment, imipenem administered alone is as effective as the cefotaxime-amikacin combination in the treatment of septicaemia or pneumonia in intensive care patients, with the exception of P. aeruginosa pneumonia in patients under assisted ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2139940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Presse Med        ISSN: 0755-4982            Impact factor:   1.228


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systemic antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  K E Unertl; F P Lenhart; H Forst; K Peter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis in non-neutropenic patients: single agent or combination therapy?

Authors:  M Extermann; C Regamey
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Adi Lador; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-07

5.  Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.

Authors:  C Jaccard; N Troillet; S Harbarth; G Zanetti; D Aymon; R Schneider; R Chiolero; B Ricou; J Romand; O Huber; P Ambrosetti; G Praz; D Lew; J Bille; M P Glauser; A Cometta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem monotherapy with imipenem plus netilmicin for treatment of severe infections in nonneutropenic patients.

Authors:  A Cometta; J D Baumgartner; D Lew; W Zimmerli; D Pittet; P Chopart; U Schaad; C Herter; P Eggimann; O Huber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Ishay Benuri-Silbiger; Karla Soares-Weiser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.